Kangaroo Court Crew will be burning an looting tonight

How so. Happens every day that they look at the evidence and decide to file charges or not. Hell in many leftist cities doesn’t matter on evidence if it a certain crime the won’t file charges regardless. Now that is injustice.

It’s not that he was shot in the back. He had a weapon (knife), he was trying to flee, and he was going to put children in dange and according to the story possibly kidnap a child. Total circumstances – justified shooting.

Good luck with that.

When they start protesting and burning an looting and throwing objects at cops tonight . . . it means they want a kangaroo court and will settle for nothing less.

Thank you. I need to trademark it and demand a dollar every time it’s used.

Let’s be consistent though. It’s either ok to ignore evidence and investigations or it’s not.

Guy gets shot in back 7 times…no charges. Some snot nose Maga kid gets called out as such…He deserves couple hundred million…Strange times we’re living in.

Not sure what you are talking about . . .

Criminal dirtbag resists officers, goes to vehicle with weapon, possibly trying to kidnap a kid/put them in danger gets shot as such.

Selective editing of video to make a kid look bad when really he wasn’t and it was the people that confrunted him.

Yea comparing apples to oranges there and not giving the full information on either of them.

Shooting an unarmed man in the back 7 times at point blank range is unacceptable. At the very least, he has proven to be not fit for law enforcement.

Wasn’t unarmed, officer beleived going for or had a weapon and it was found at the scene.

Was he “unarmed”?

Yes…he was.

Are you sure?

Yep…he was not armed.

You really want to equate being shot in the back 7 TIMES to finding a pocket knife in the car?

It doesn’t say “pocket” knife, does it?

A knife is a deadly weapon in every state in the union.

7 times is excessive no matter how you spin it Taz.

1 Like

Now that we’ve established you were wrong.

You ever shot anybody?

Might want to lay off the nicknames.

Just pointing out what you did there. 7 times was excessive either way. He did not have a weapon in his hand and the officer’s life was not in jeopardy.

You ever shoot anybody?

How do you know the weapon he had wasn’t in his hand? A minute ago you said he didn’t have one at all.