Kamala Harris wants to take existing healthcare coverage from over 150 million Americans

johnwk2 · 2020-10-02T12:44:12.511Z

gooddad409:

johnwk2:

gooddad409:

peek-a-boo:

Solving the problem is one thing. The wholesale government takeover of an entire industry is something else altogether.

A very small segment of our society is being left out. By far the vast majority of Americans are happy with their health care. So let’s focus on that small segment. Leave the rest of Americans alone. That is exactly what would be done if DEMs truly cared. But they don’t. They are power hungry and will stop at nothing to achieve their goal of absolute power.

My nephew for example was happy with his health care. 350 a month with a low deductable.

When Obamacare came out his employer dropped his insurance which forced the nephew on Obamacare.

!300 a month in premiums(more than his mortgage payments) 6000 dollar deductable. He really “appreciates” Obamacare.

The very purpose of Obamacare is to financially squeeze our hard working productive citizens in order to provide healthcare to foreigners and aliens. It’s your duty to provide healthcare to the 1.5 million DACA and 3.6 million DREAMERS, even if you cannot afford health insurance for your own family.

JWK

When it comes to healthcare Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have no moral compass whatsoever. They refuse to make the distinction between CHARITABLE GIVING and tax tyranny to support the health care needs of millions of illegal entrants and foreign aliens.

Well they certainly squeezed the Hell out of my nephew and his wife.

That’s what communism and socialism is about ___ plundering the financial resources of the most successful and hard working people in the community and transferring those resources to the least productive and unsuccessful citizens, which in turn makes everyone suffer equally, except those who are in charge of confiscating and redistributing the “wealth”, an example being Nancy Pelosi who lives large on the taxpayer’s dime:

JWK

They are neither “liberals” nor “progressives”. They are conniving Marxist/Communist/Socialist parasites who use government force to steal and then enjoy the property which labor, business and investors have worked to create.

gooddad409 · 2020-10-02T13:03:12.846Z

Exactly. The only ones supporting it are the folks who think they will be running it and the ner do wells who are hoping to get a while lot of somethings for nothing.

They don’t seem to realize that all (except the top) under communism are equally poor.

fallenturtle · 2020-10-02T16:06:36.197Z

johnwk2:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Ice Cream Cache - Show & Tell - YouTube

Look at that filthy capitalist hording all that ice cream!

johnwk2 · 2020-10-02T20:10:03.154Z

johnwk2:

That’s what communism and socialism is about ___ plundering the financial resources of the most successful and hard working people in the community and transferring those resources to the least productive and unsuccessful citizens, which in turn makes everyone suffer equally, except those who are in charge of confiscating and redistributing the “wealth”, an example being Nancy Pelosi who lives large on the taxpayer’s dime:

Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Ice Cream Cache - Show & Tell1280×720 102 KB

Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s Ice Cream Cache - Show & Tell

JWK

fallenturtle:

Look at that filthy capitalist hording all that ice cream!

Filthy capitalist? She has been living large off the taxpayers’ dime for over 30 years.

JWK

fallenturtle · 2020-10-02T21:44:24.246Z

You think her salary of $223,500 a year is her only source of income? I’m not kidding when I say she’s a capitalist. She has stock in a bunch of companies, owns a vineyard, has written books, and owns several properties that she collects rent on. And then of course there’s the money that her husband brings in.
Her financial disclosures for 2019:

pfds.opensecrets.org

N00007360_2018.pdf

89.31 KB

johnwk2 · 2020-10-02T23:04:22.590Z

fallenturtle:

You think her salary of $223,500 a year is her only source of income? I’m not kidding when I say she’s a capitalist. She has stock in a bunch of companies, owns a vineyard, has written books, and owns several properties that she collects rent on. And then of course there’s the money that her husband brings in.

And, in addition to all that, she has been living large off the taxpayers’ dime for over 30 years.

JWK

fallenturtle · 2020-10-02T23:06:49.410Z

johnwk2:

fallenturtle:

You think her salary of $223,500 a year is her only source of income? I’m not kidding when I say she’s a capitalist. She has stock in a bunch of companies, owns a vineyard, has written books, and owns several properties that she collects rent on. And then of course there’s the money that her husband brings in.

And, in addition to all that, she has been living large off the taxpayers’ dime for over 30 years.

JWK

Am I supposed to be outraged that we pay people in office a salary?

johnwk2 · 2020-10-02T23:30:43.260Z

fallenturtle:

johnwk2:

fallenturtle:

You think her salary of $223,500 a year is her only source of income? I’m not kidding when I say she’s a capitalist. She has stock in a bunch of companies, owns a vineyard, has written books, and owns several properties that she collects rent on. And then of course there’s the money that her husband brings in.

And, in addition to all that, she has been living large off the taxpayers’ dime for over 30 years.

JWK

Am I supposed to be outraged that we pay people in office a salary?

Well, now that you mention outrage, you ought to be outraged when your leader’s philosophy is:

Do as I say and not as I do!

fallenturtle · 2020-10-03T06:35:31.607Z

johnwk2:

Well, now that you mention outrage, you ought to be outraged when your leader’s philosophy is: Do as I say and not as I do!

She’s not my leader, I don’t live in her district. She shouldn’t have done this but I don’t think it worth being outraged over.

johnwk2 · 2020-10-03T10:56:59.478Z

fallenturtle:

johnwk2:

Well, now that you mention outrage, you ought to be outraged when your leader’s philosophy is: Do as I say and not as I do!

She’s not my leader,

You have switched to the Republican Party?

BTW, what do you think about Harris wanting to take existing private healthcare coverage away from over 150 million Americans and forcing them into a socialist, Cuban style healthcare system?

JWK

To support Joe Biden and Kamala Harris is to support a continuance with Obama’s love affair with our Global Governance Crowd

fallenturtle · 2020-10-03T18:08:27.448Z

johnwk2:

You have switched to the Republican Party?

No, I’m not a member of any political parties.

johnwk2:

BTW, what do you think about Harris wanting to take existing private healthcare coverage away from over 150 million Americans and forcing them into a socialist, Cuban style healthcare system?

I already told you she doesn’t want to do that. Medicare for all isn’t a “Cuban style healthcare system.”

johnwk2 · 2020-10-04T15:58:13.032Z

fallenturtle:

johnwk2:

You have switched to the Republican Party?

No, I’m not a member of any political parties.

Well, you do promote ideas which are in harmony with socialist/communist thinking such as:

you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

you do not defend the inalienable right of people being free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations;

and you advocate using the force of taxation to acquire the financial resources of an identifiable group of people, which you would then “redistribute” to another identifiable group for that group’s personal economic needs;

So, it seems perfectly clear where you stand in the political spectrum.

JWK

"From each according to their ability to pay, to each who needs help living a decent life." ___ fallenturtle

fallenturtle · 2020-10-04T19:00:02.545Z

I’m a social democrat.

Those things you listed don’t make someone a socialist. Stop posting ■■■■■■■■■

johnwk2 · 2020-10-04T19:53:02.441Z

fallenturtle:

I’m a social democrat.

Those things you listed don’t make someone a socialist. Stop posting ■■■■■■■■■

I have correctly assumed for a number of years your political views are closely associated with that of a socialist and socialism, some of the identifying characteristics being:

you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

you do not defend the inalienable right of people being free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations;

you advocate using the force of taxation to acquire the financial resources of an identifiable group of people, which are then to be “redistribute” by the hand of government to another identifiable group for that group’s personal economic needs;

And, you certainly have no moral compass when it comes to helping the needy, i.e., your reject CHARITABLE GIVING in favor of tax tyranny, as eloquently summed up by one of our forefathers:

“Under a just and equal Government, every individual is entitled to protection in the enjoyment of the whole product of his labor, except such portion of it as is necessary to enable Government to protect the rest; this is given only in consideration of the protection offered. In every bounty, exclusive right, or monopoly, Government violates the stipulation on her part; for, by such a regulation, the product of one man’s labor is transferred to the use and enjoyment of another. The exercise of such a right on the part of Government can be justified on no other principle, than that the whole product of the labor or every individual is the real property of Government, and may be distributed among the several parts of the community by government discretion; such a supposition would directly involve the idea, that every individual in the community is merely a slave and bondsman to Government, who, although he may labor, is not to expect protection in the product of his labor. An authority given to any Government to exercise such a principle, would lead to a complete system of tyranny.” ___ See Representative Giles, speaking before Congress February 3rd, 1792

JWK

The Biden/Harris healthcare plan will tax America’s productive citizens and her Senior citizens to provide healthcare to the 1.5 million DACA and 3.6 million Dreamers in our country ___ LINK

fallenturtle · 2020-10-04T23:58:54.135Z

johnwk2:

I have correctly assumed for a number of years your political views are closely associated with that of a socialist and socialism, some of the identifying characteristics being:

you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

Sure I do. Don’t steal. Taxes aren’t stealing.

johnwk2:

you do not defend the inalienable right of people being free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations;

Depends on the contract. Citizens should be protected from predatory and unfair contracts… so no, its not inalienable… but for the most part I’m fine with it. That’s not socialist.

johnwk2:

you advocate using the force of taxation to acquire the financial resources of an identifiable group of people, which are then to be “redistribute” by the hand of government to another identifiable group for that group’s personal economic needs;

So do lots of pro-capitalists. Its not socialist.

johnwk2:

And, you certainly have no moral compass when it comes to helping the needy, i.e., your reject CHARITABLE GIVING in favor of tax tyranny,

Don’t insult my morality. I support welfare because I consider it a more efficient and effective way to help the needy. I also don’t reject charitable giving, I support a system of both,

johnwk2 · 2020-10-05T01:44:21.684Z

fallenturtle:

johnwk2:

I have correctly assumed for a number of years your political views are closely associated with that of a socialist and socialism, some of the identifying characteristics being:

you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

Sure I do. Don’t steal. Taxes aren’t stealing.

As I correctly pointed out, you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

You advocate using the force of taxation to acquire the property of an identifiable group of people, which is then to be “redistribute” by the hand of government to another identifiable group for that group’s personal economic needs. And that, my friend is robbery, AKA stealing!

“To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation.”____ Savings and Loan Association v.Topeka,(1875).

JWK

“The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of the poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his own hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property.” ___ Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746 (1884)

fallenturtle · 2020-10-05T05:53:50.870Z

johnwk2:

fallenturtle:

johnwk2:

I have correctly assumed for a number of years your political views are closely associated with that of a socialist and socialism, some of the identifying characteristics being:

you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

Sure I do. Don’t steal. Taxes aren’t stealing.

As I correctly pointed out, you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

You advocate using the force of taxation to acquire the property of an identifiable group of people, which is then to be “redistribute” by the hand of government to another identifiable group for that group’s personal economic needs. And that, my friend is robbery, AKA stealing!

“To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation.”____ Savings and Loan Association v.Topeka,(1875).

JWK

“The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of the poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his own hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property.” ___ Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746 (1884)

Taxes aren’t stealing. If you don’t want to pay them, you could always move to a different country.

johnwk2 · 2020-10-05T13:52:26.386Z

fallenturtle:

johnwk2:

fallenturtle:

johnwk2:

I have correctly assumed for a number of years your political views are closely associated with that of a socialist and socialism, some of the identifying characteristics being:

you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

Sure I do. Don’t steal. Taxes aren’t stealing.

As I correctly pointed out, you do not defend rights associated with property ownership;

You advocate using the force of taxation to acquire the property of an identifiable group of people, which is then to be “redistribute” by the hand of government to another identifiable group for that group’s personal economic needs. And that, my friend is robbery, AKA stealing!

“To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation.”____ Savings and Loan Association v.Topeka,(1875).

JWK

“The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of the poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his own hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property.” ___ Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746 (1884)

Taxes aren’t stealing. If you don’t want to pay them, you could always move to a different country.

Unlike your willingness to use taxation to acquire the property of one group of people and transfer that property to another group of people for their personal economic needs, I support our written Constitution, part of which commands that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. I know socialists do not support that provision of our constitution, but there it is, in black and white.

In any event, and in response to your snarky post, the manner in which taxes [imposts, duties, excises and direct taxes] are laid, and how that tax revenue is used, can certainly define if “robbery” has occurred, as pointed out by our very own Supreme Court:

“To lay with one hand the power of the government on the property of the citizen [a working person’s earned wage] and with the other to bestow upon favored individuals, to aid private enterprises and build up private fortunes is none the less a robbery because it is done under forms of law and called taxation.” ____ Savings and Loan Association v.Topeka,(1875).

Additionally, here is how one of our forefathers summarized the point in question:

“Under a just and equal Government, every individual is entitled to protection in the enjoyment of the whole product of his labor, except such portion of it as is necessary to enable Government to protect the rest; this is given only in consideration of the protection offered. In every bounty, exclusive right, or monopoly, Government violates the stipulation on her part; for, by such a regulation, the product of one man’s labor is transferred to the use and enjoyment of another. The exercise of such a right on the part of Government can be justified on no other principle, than that the whole product of the labor or every individual is the real property of Government, and may be distributed among the several parts of the community by government discretion; such a supposition would directly involve the idea, that every individual in the community is merely a slave and bondsman to Government, who, although he may labor, is not to expect protection in the product of his labor. An authority given to any Government to exercise such a principle, would lead to a complete system of tyranny.” ___ See Representative Giles, speaking before Congress February 3rd, 1792

And now that we have reviewed part of our Constitution in reference to taxation, I will add another characteristic to my list which identifies a socialist:

They do not support an equal per capita federal tax whenever a “direct tax” is laid upon the citizens of the United States, as our Constitution commands.

JWK

When it comes to healthcare Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have no moral compass whatsoever. They refuse to make the distinction between CHARITABLE GIVING and tax tyranny to support the health care needs of millions of illegal entrants and foreign aliens.

fallenturtle · 2020-10-05T15:37:03.997Z

johnwk2:

Unlike your willingness to use taxation to acquire the property of one group of people and transfer that property to another group of people for their personal economic needs, I support our written Constitution, part of which commands that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation.

Taxes are constitutional. Taxes are not stealing.

johnwk2:

I know socialists do not support that provision of our constitution, but there it is, in black and white.

You’ve shown over and over that you have no idea what socialists do or don’t support.

johnwk2:

And now that we have reviewed part of our Constitution in reference to taxation, I will add another characteristic to my list which identifies a socialist:

They do not support an equal per capita federal tax whenever a “direct tax” is laid upon the citizens of the United States, as our Constitution commands.

There you go with the Humpty Dumpty language again. The definition of a socialist isn’t whatever @JohnWK2 declares it to be.

altair1013 · 2020-10-05T15:40:33.900Z

Why don’t the democrats simply cut the crap and offer everybody the exact same plan that they have? Seriously. They are over thinking this. I think we would all be delighted with the congressional plan. What’s the down side?