Kamala Harris wants to give out free money

mobulis · 2018-10-27T07:54:21.655Z

Samm:

mobulis:

Again, if it fit the definition of socialism it would be under the definition of socialism and not under a separate category.

By definition, synonyms are the same category.

No their not.

Samm · 2018-10-27T18:22:14.378Z

mobulis:

Samm:

mobulis:

Again, if it fit the definition of socialism it would be under the definition of socialism and not under a separate category.

By definition, synonyms are the same category.

No their not.

Their what?

mobulis · 2018-10-27T18:23:42.162Z

Samm:

mobulis:

Samm:

mobulis:

Again, if it fit the definition of socialism it would be under the definition of socialism and not under a separate category.

By definition, synonyms are the same category.

No their not.

Their what?

Their not the same category.

Samm · 2018-10-27T18:27:22.247Z

mobulis:

Samm:

mobulis:

Samm:

mobulis:

Again, if it fit the definition of socialism it would be under the definition of socialism and not under a separate category.

By definition, synonyms are the same category.

No their not.

Their what?

Their not the same category.

Their what?

PocketAces · 2018-10-29T15:32:59.768Z

I thought you were a Socialist?

PocketAces · 2018-10-30T15:10:38.049Z

Most Democratic Politicians in general want to give out free money.

That way, America can become a Socialist country quicker. lol.

Samson_Corwell · 2018-10-31T03:43:33.842Z

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Samson_Corwell · 2018-10-31T03:44:27.899Z

Samm:

mobulis:

If it fit the definition of socialism it would be under the definition of socialism and not under a separate category.

synonyms: leftism, welfarism; QED

Uh, no. Try again.

Samm · 2018-10-31T20:08:31.894Z

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Not even remotely.

Samm · 2018-10-31T20:09:30.863Z

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

mobulis:

If it fit the definition of socialism it would be under the definition of socialism and not under a separate category.

synonyms: leftism, welfarism; QED

Uh, no. Try again.

Uh, yes. Consult your Thesaurus.

Samson_Corwell · 2018-10-31T22:46:27.604Z

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Not even remotely.

That last one, absentee ownership, is in reference to rentiers. Income derived rents is entirely unproductive in nature, unlike, say, building things.

Samm · 2018-11-01T20:12:15.694Z

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Not even remotely.

That last one, absentee ownership, is in reference to rentiers. Income derived rents is entirely unproductive in nature, unlike, say, building things.

Wrong. Even the absent owner has invested his capital in the real estate and thus is due a return on investment. That IS productivity.

Samson_Corwell · 2018-11-02T03:24:38.878Z

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Not even remotely.

That last one, absentee ownership, is in reference to rentiers. Income derived rents is entirely unproductive in nature, unlike, say, building things.

Wrong. Even the absent owner has invested his capital in the real estate and thus is due a return on investment. That IS productivity.

It isn’t. The money gotten in return is a product of sitting back and letting the money flow in (and, yes, I’m aware of upkeep and so on).

Samm · 2018-11-02T06:09:12.345Z

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Not even remotely.

That last one, absentee ownership, is in reference to rentiers. Income derived rents is entirely unproductive in nature, unlike, say, building things.

Wrong. Even the absent owner has invested his capital in the real estate and thus is due a return on investment. That IS productivity.

It isn’t. The money gotten in return is a product of sitting back and letting the money flow in (and, yes, I’m aware of upkeep and so on).

So all landlords are freeloading bums? Interesting perspective.

mobulis · 2018-11-02T06:37:08.410Z

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Not even remotely.

That last one, absentee ownership, is in reference to rentiers. Income derived rents is entirely unproductive in nature, unlike, say, building things.

Wrong. Even the absent owner has invested his capital in the real estate and thus is due a return on investment. That IS productivity.

It isn’t. The money gotten in return is a product of sitting back and letting the money flow in (and, yes, I’m aware of upkeep and so on).

So all landlords are freeloading bums? Interesting perspective.

Where does his post say that?

Samm · 2018-11-02T06:59:27.095Z

mobulis:

Where does his post say that?

Please try to keep up. He equated royalties for patents and copyrights and rent from property with welfare.

mobulis · 2018-11-02T07:55:33.124Z

Samm:

mobulis:

Where does his post say that?

Please try to keep up. He equated royalties for patents and copyrights and rent from property with welfare.

So it doesn’t.

Kyshia · 2018-11-02T08:52:26.269Z

Samm:

Their what?

Their

not the same category.

Samson_Corwell · 2018-11-02T15:54:56.690Z

mobulis:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Not even remotely.

That last one, absentee ownership, is in reference to rentiers. Income derived rents is entirely unproductive in nature, unlike, say, building things.

Wrong. Even the absent owner has invested his capital in the real estate and thus is due a return on investment. That IS productivity.

It isn’t. The money gotten in return is a product of sitting back and letting the money flow in (and, yes, I’m aware of upkeep and so on).

So all landlords are freeloading bums? Interesting perspective.

Where does his post say that?

It doesn’t. It isn’t something I believe.

Samm · 2018-11-02T21:20:27.334Z

Samson_Corwell:

mobulis:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

Samson_Corwell:

Samm:

[…] it is a program whose purpose is to redistribute the fruits of productivity to the unproductive.

Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?

Not even remotely.

That last one, absentee ownership, is in reference to rentiers. Income derived rents is entirely unproductive in nature, unlike, say, building things.

Wrong. Even the absent owner has invested his capital in the real estate and thus is due a return on investment. That IS productivity.

It isn’t. The money gotten in return is a product of sitting back and letting the money flow in (and, yes, I’m aware of upkeep and so on).

So all landlords are freeloading bums? Interesting perspective.

Where does his post say that?

It doesn’t. It isn’t something I believe.

If not, then what did you mean when you relied “Liiiiike patents, copyright, and absentee ownership?” to my post about welfare?