No need for quotation marks on that. The FBI knows something that you don’t.
Allan
What does your post have to do with what I wrote and you responded to? I don’t see the connection.
JWK
Our socialist/communist controlled democrat party leadership personifies a living creature, a predator: it grows, it multiplies, it protects itself, it feeds on those it can defeat, and does everything to expand its powers and flourish, even at the expense of enslaving a nation’s inner cities’ entire population.
What exactly are you having an issue with understanding?
Help me out and I will explain further.
In the meantime you stated Biden’s lack of transparency on court packing is going to be an issue.
I asked you to give me a metric as to how you know this, and why voters might be more upset with this than they are Trump and the GOP filling the seat when they don’t want him to do so unless he wins re-election.
I thought it was a straightforward question but happy to clarify anything you need to have clarified.
What on earth are you talking about. Do you have something productive to add to the thread?
JWK
Let’s not forget Joe Biden does not support the right to work and individuals being free to negotiate their own employment contracts. He wants every American to pay a union representative a monthly kickback fee in order to work in America .
I asked you a question: What does your post have to do with what I wrote and you responded to? I don’t see the connection.?
JWK
I told you the connection. You stated Biden’s lack of transparency on court packing is going to be an issue.
I asked how for a metric as to how you know this, and then compared it with another issue and asked for your thoughts.
It was a direct response to a post you made.
Now does that clear it up?
Can you answer the question now?
I know and I explained the connection.
So why are you having a problem? All am doing is asking you to back up what you stated.
There is no connection to what I wrote in THIS POST
Your answer was projections and presumptions to a factual comment I made.
JWK
'What is a punt, Alex?"
1 Like
Yes…you said transparency is going to be an issue.
I asked you how you know this.
No. What I said was, transparency is an issue, and Biden is not being transparent. Your response was:
It’s important to you.
But guess what…you already weren’t voting for Biden.
What’s your metric for knowing the court packing thing is more of an issue to voters than Trump and the GOP pushing through his SCOTUS nominee when the great majority of voters want the winner of the election to fill that seat?
Don’t cite past precedent…no one is arguing that the President and the GOP don’t have the power to do this. What’s being argued is the VOTERS don’t want them to.
What does all that have to do with what I wrote and you responded to?
You have an awful lot of projections and assumptions in your response.
JWK
.
1 Like
Yes…I asked how you know it’s an issue?
If it’s an issue to YOU, that’s fine.
But irrelevant because you’re not voting for Biden and never were going to.
The only way it will be relevant from a practical point of view is if it changes a lot of voters’ minds on Biden.
So…were you saying it’s an issue to YOU or were you saying it’s an issue to voters who are leaning Biden and may change their minds?
If the former than cool for you.
If the latter…how do you know it’s an issue?
It was brought up on MSNBC and I posted the video in the post you quoted. I wrote:
Well, it is, and Biden is not being transparent:
Did you ignore the video?
JWK
Don’t think of it so much is court packing, think of it as redecorating the Supreme Court.
In truth, the GOP Not care about the rules being flipped and flopped on whatever McConnell wishes. So I don’t care what the Dems do.
So it was brought up on MSNBC.
How does that mean it’s an issue?
Biden is making a calculation…it won’t affect him with voters enough to cost him the election.
Hence…not an issue.
Do you care how adding four of five more Justices to the Supreme Court who would impose their personal views of social justice, fairness and reasonableness as the “rule of law” rather than what our Constitution actually states and is intended to mean?
JWK
"The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice." – Justice Hugo L. Black ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968
Just as I thought. You are not here for a productive discussion.
JWK
Melania’s coat summed it up best. I really don’t care.
Vertaling: ik stop.
(Translation: I quit.)
