Justice Kavanaugh recognizes that the President is the sole Commander in Chief and that Judges need to butt out of military issues

[bigtwnvin]

@SixFoot

So anyway, Kavanaugh is cool with the libs now.

OOOHHH YEEESSS!!

[tnt]

@SixFoot

Mmhmm. He was an evil drunken rapist before he “ruled correctly”. Happens every time.

Why can’t both things be true?

You don’t have to love someone just because you agree with them on something.

[tnt]

@Ben_Natuf

no, it was precisely mine. the religious exemption is pretty much moot going in. no reason to deny it for those already in. the number of people claiming it will be very small and the risk will be less than minimal.

Yeah, I agree with that. IMO, the exemption has to have a threshold of…what’s the right word…it can’t just be a layup - you have to prove it somehow…

But since we didn’t know about cover when everyone joined up, there should be an escape hatch if there is sincerely religious conflict.

But moving forward, no.

[WuWei]

Good of you to decide for a group of which you’ll never be a part.

[tnt]

@WuWei

Good of you to decide for a group of which you’ll never be a part.

Lol.

Way to address the post, not the poster!

Poof, gone!

[gooddad409]

@WuWei

Good of you to decide for a group of which you’ll never be a part.

Karenism.

[WuWei]

@tnt

@WuWei

Good of you to decide for a group of which you’ll never be a part.

Lol.

Way to address the post, not the poster!

Poof, gone!

LOLOL. It is addressing the post. Specifically this:

@tnt

But moving forward, no.

LOL

[gooddad409]

I hope the OP feels the same way when Trump returns to office.

[WuWei]

The New “Sensibility”. It’s fanatical in its fervor.

[Ben_Natuf]

wrong again. i served. i had no choice about vaccines going in except not to join. i had no real choice about japenes encephalitis except to miss movement, which would have meant being discharged. likely under less than honorable conditions.

[WuWei]

What’s wrong about it?

[Ben_Natuf]

scotus has already said it is not the governments place to question peoples religious convictions. it is deffinitely not

[Ben_Natuf]

i’m not speaking from ignorance, i’m speaking from the possition of someone who’s been there. and someone who was faced with the choice of taking an experimental vaccine i did not want or ending my carreer

[tnt]

[quote=“WuWei, post:67, topic:241677, full:true”]

@tnt

@WuWei

Good of you to decide for a group of which you’ll never be a part.
[/quote]

Lol.

Way to address the post, not the poster!

Poof, gone!

LOLOL. It is addressing the post. Specifically this:

@tnt

But moving forward, no.

LOL

You’re being silly.

that post has nothing to do with the poster. You brought that in because…well, who knows!

[tnt]

@Ben_Natuf

scotus has already said it is not the governments place to question peoples religious convictions. it is deffinitely not

Yeah, but do you agree that they have to actually HAVE them?

[tnt]

@Ben_Natuf

i’m not speaking from ignorance, i’m speaking from the possition of someone who’s been there. and someone who was faced with the choice of taking an experimental vaccine i did not want or ending my carreer

If you don’t mind, which vaccine? Anthrax? What did you decide?

[Ben_Natuf]

its not the governments place to question it. period.

[Ben_Natuf]

japanese encephalitis. i chose my carreer. i got the vaccine

[WuWei]

@Ben_Natuf

i’m not speaking from ignorance, i’m speaking from the possition of someone who’s been there. and someone who was faced with the choice of taking an experimental vaccine i did not want or ending my carreer

I think you might be misunderstanding my post.

[biggestal99]

@WuWei

Good of you to decide for a group of which you’ll never be a part.

I’ll never be an NFL qb.

But I know the difference between Brady and Keenum.

Allan