Yep, the WB has second-hand info which has now been replaced with first-hand info corroborating the WB. At this point, the WB is superfluous.
But cons will continue to rage about the WB and create wholly made up attacks not realizing the WB doesn’t matter anymore.
Probably because they are getting their thoughts from Trump who is personally offended by the “treachery” of the WB in not being 100% loyal to Trump. Trump will make that WB pay and by extension, his supporters continue to be similarly obsessed.
The insistence on unmasking the Whistleblower is part of the Republican efforts to make the process look bad, because they cannot make a case based on the evidence.
Remember, early on, conservatives denounced the Whistleblower for only reporting second hand or hearsay information. As the witnesses with direct knowledge came forward, the Whistleblower transformed into being the key to the case for conservatives.
Its been fun to watch Conservatives make up new positions to fit the shifting winds in this process.
The very definition of a troll thread…show up conspire on a theory, ask some questions and then disappear never to respond again. LOL…This is some funny stuff though. I am enjoying reading responses to this.
Exactly. They’re desperate for someone who fits one of their cartoonish stereotypes of a “lib” or something to slime, without regard to whether they’re a fact witness or not.
Cons know that the WB is old news. But they have to have something to distract everyone from the facts. It was almost laughable how many Cons on the committee ragged on about the WB yesterday.
We know he hired at least two of the Obama era NSC holdovers to his office, so it’s very likely Schiff could be the second hand non-whistleblower. At the very least we know the complaint is tied to his office either directly or indirectly. He is now denying knowing the identity of the complainant to keep from being called as a fact witness in his own investigation. What a “congenital liar”.
