I doubt that. There are going to be good students and poor students in every school. The 16% of students above proficiency in math might all be Asian. You don’t know. And even if 100% of the Asian students were doing well, if most of the rest of the students were screwing off the school would be performing poorly. Of course with student teacher ratio of 243:1 even the brightest students are in a losing situation.
But as usual, you offer up a terrible example to try to prove your point.
No, it doesn’t. It does not address the assertion that Asians as a class (group) do better academically than other minority groups. Your example resolved absolutely nothing about that point. You presented no data that shows the class standing of any student of any race. As usual, you confuse presenting facts with presenting pertinent facts.
An influx of undocumented migrants into the U.S. strains services in many cities and presents challenges to public school systems, affecting the quality of education and imposing new costs on taxpayers.
Okay, so then how do you know any of the rest of the article is correct? And even if everything else is correct, you still haven’t shown that the Asian students in that school are not the best academically.
The refugees are being flown to the U.S. from Haiti, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Cuba, Guatemala, Ecuador and Colombia, the report notes, though even greater numbers may have been flown in through June and July after the administration expanded the program to allow for migrants from Honduras and El Salvador.
The expansion of the program comes despite the U.S. traditionally only granting refugee status to individuals who can credibly claim that they cannot return to their home country out of a “well-founded fear” of persecution on the basis of race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group, but the CIS analysis argued that many of those coming to the U.S. would more normally be classified as economic migrants.
The report cites a 2024 Mixed Migration Centre survey of program participants that found 90% indicated they wanted to travel to the U.S. for economic opportunities and higher living standards, not to flee potential persecution.
The administration has also raised the allotted slots to admit refugees from Latin America, from less than 5,000 when President Biden took office to 50,000 in 2024.
“The numbers have indeed decreased and have decreased significantly,” Homeland Security Sec. Alejandro Mayorkas told USA TODAY. “The reason for it is not singular. It is a number of different measures that we and others have taken.”
funny we have NOT heard a peep about this from the “open borders” crew.
Under Biden/Harris the Cartels have controlled what happens at the border. So I’m pretty sure that they also know it’s election season and they have a vested interest in a Harris Presidency. Mark this post, I’ll bet anything if she wins you will see a renewed surge at the border again.