Just A Fair Process

SimplyTrying · 2018-09-28T14:06:57.173Z

Hellsbane:

Word of advice, stay away from the DU.

If only it were just du.

Jezcoe · 2018-09-28T14:14:22.265Z

bootz:

Because U r a contrarian.

I take it you think there is a difference between a managed economy like WW2 and a planned economy, like WW2.

You cannot manage an economy as Nixon learned in price controls

you cannot regulate out corruption as you learned with Enron.

You can only encourage competition.

The thing is that I am at least making an attempt to not make braid and sweeping generalizations like a contrarian would.

But let us hear what you would do?

How would you “encourage competition?”

bootz · 2018-09-28T14:20:43.174Z

Fox is fair and balanced as they should be. But it is not news.

Mentally all liberals are milquetoast.

Free speech does not pertain to content, it pertains to access.

Yesterday, I started a thread about the FBI investigating the democrats, it was merged into the Kavanaugh thread. but it was not about the judge. it was about knowing pushing a false narrative for political gain.

bootz · 2018-09-28T14:25:35.221Z

I would shrink government and spending, lessen regulations, remove all tariffs, lower corporate taxes, stop sheltering polluters form lawsuits, encourage start ups by removing barriers to market entry. Apply laws uniformly,

change campaign finance laws and require full disclosure, not allow politicians to invest in any companies impacted by their legislative positions. Unless of course it was Trump

Jezcoe · 2018-09-28T14:26:34.199Z

bootz:

Fox is fair and balanced as they should be. But it is not news.

Mentally all liberals are milquetoast.

Free speech does not pertain to content, it pertains to access.

Yesterday, I started a thread about the FBI investigating the democrats, it was merged into the Kavanaugh thread. but it was not about the judge. it was about knowing pushing a false narrative for political gain.

In no world does “free speech” pertain to access.

That is simply wrong on it’s face.

Jezcoe · 2018-09-28T14:27:22.590Z

bootz:

I would shrink government and spending, lessen regulations, remove all tariffs, lower corporate taxes, stop sheltering polluters form lawsuits, encourage start ups by removing barriers to market entry. Apply laws uniformly,

change campaign finance laws and require full disclosure, not allow politicians to invest in any companies impacted by their legislative positions. Unless of course it was Trump

Let’s take the first part.

What in government would you shrink and how much?

JayJay · 2018-09-28T14:29:13.085Z

bootz:

Fox is fair and balanced as they should be. But it is not news.

Mentally all liberals are milquetoast.

Free speech does not pertain to content, it pertains to access.

Yesterday, I started a thread about the FBI investigating the democrats, it was merged into the Kavanaugh thread. but it was not about the judge. it was about knowing pushing a false narrative for political gain.

Not everyone has access to FoxNews or Sean’s radio show.

Else Sean Hannity would not be allowed to use call screeners.

Ever wonder why you don’t hear a bigger balance of ideas from callers calling into Sean’s show?

Because he screens out all but his supporters and also a smattering of those opposing voices he feels he can control via how he allows them to speak.

As is his right…it’s his show.

JayJay · 2018-09-28T14:34:06.759Z

I wonder if the OPer understands he’s doing EXACTLY what he should be doing re: calling out perceived unfairness.

He’s CALLING ATTENTIOM TO IT wherever he can so other people know and can be warned.

THAT is how you do it. You don’t ask for Mommy Government to help you.

bootz · 2018-09-28T14:34:32.861Z

how do you apply peaceful assembly in 2018 and 1791

bootz · 2018-09-28T14:35:58.505Z

and so now you see the point of the thread.

Bravo JJ bravo.

bootz · 2018-09-28T14:36:59.066Z

Bravo, bravo.

This is a censored forum, like all the rest.

Jezcoe · 2018-09-28T14:49:48.114Z

bootz:

how do you apply peaceful assembly in 2018 and 1791

In 1791 could you demand to go into someone else’s house and exert your free speech?

bootz · 2018-09-28T14:51:29.380Z

is that what peaceful assembly was in 1791

Jezcoe · 2018-09-28T14:52:46.980Z

bootz:

is that what peaceful assembly was in 1791

First it was free speech… now you are speaking of peaceful assembly.

Can you stick to a topic?

bootz · 2018-09-28T14:53:57.268Z

same amendment

Jezcoe · 2018-09-28T14:55:12.732Z

bootz:

same amendment

There are a lot of different things lumped into that amendment.

When you figure out the topic get back to us.

bootz · 2018-09-28T15:04:00.310Z

The right of assembly is so that citizens can protest and speak freely. They are the same.

LucyLou · 2018-09-28T15:07:30.907Z

bootz:

The right of assembly is so that citizens can protest and speak freely. They are the same.

You don’t have the right to assemble, protest, and speak freely at the top of trump tower. Or in my house.

JayJay · 2018-09-28T15:11:46.405Z

There’s no point to this thread.

Platform owners do not have an obligation to be fair.

Jezcoe · 2018-09-28T15:17:01.971Z

bootz:

The right of assembly is so that citizens can protest and speak freely. They are the same.

Sure.

In 1791 did anyone have the right to assemble in someone else’s house to express their right to speech?