She is not being asked to do anything pertaining to religion or her Christian faith. It’s purely a legal issue. By asking to be married by a judge, these citizens are expressly avoiding religious marriage.
Sure they do.
(C) participate in activities that would appear to a reasonable person to undermine the judge’s independence,* integrity,* or impartiality;*
The judge refuses to marry a same sex couple as part of her extrajudicial duties. A court case comes up in which a litigant it homosexual or a same sex couple. Prove she would be impartial given her obvious partiality when performing her extrajudicial duty.
Strzok did it.
2 Likes
Maybe you can remind us what happened to Strzok on August 10, 2018.
Not sure the validity of the comparison anyway. An FBI agent’s personal text messages versus a judge openly refusing to marry gay couples. Whatever.
The person denied them the service. You can play word games all you want.
Very good point. I don’t see how this is debatable.
Media are private entities, not public. Parents are private entities, not public. Parents brainwash their kids every day on religions, I don’t see you saying that is wrong.
He wasn’t fired because he couldn’t separate bias from his job.
You’re not sure of the validity? Strange. Strzok put people in prison. This woman is pointing people down the road.
She should perform the marriages or resign. But get consistent. If Strzok can set bias aside, so can everyone else.
Bakeries are private entities, not public.
1 Like
BS.
MEDIA is public and deceptive. If media is Anti-American. It can go to hell where it belongs.
All the goal of takeovers are well established, whether, nazi, commie, globalist, etc. All of them actively seek to control, media, education, currency,
markets, childbirth, medical, politicians, government and all thought as well.
All of that is Anti-American.
Strangely corporate personhood is there when convenient.
And subject to PA laws, right?
Is the media run by the govt?
A wanna be world government.
He was quite literally fired for his anti-Trump text messages. Was that not a sign of potential bias or are you saying he wasn’t biased but fired for other reasons?
I’m being completely consistent. If Strzok’s beliefs led to partiality or significant fear of partiality, he should have been dismissed. If this judge’s beliefs and actions lead to significant concern for lack of impartiality, she should also be dismissed.
I will leave you to your thoughts on this.
1 Like
That’s pretty easy.
It was mentioned at the beginning of the thread that she recused herself from those cases also.
1 Like
Maybe she’s just some do-gooder trying to push the boundary a bit. They’re all attention-seekers IMO. That’s just an underlying trait.
I’m not playing word games. Can I go to the DMV and apply for food stamps? If the answer is “no” then is the DMV denying me a service by telling me which office does do that service?
By your definition: yes. Which is idiocy at its finest.
Yeah, I know, that’s just a "conspiracy theory’ …ah no not a theory although it is a conspiracy and it’s going to be over. America knows it.
There is ample proof.
That analogy doesn’t hold up. She does provide the service already. Just for the “right” people only, though.
She’s not providing a religious service. It’s a government service. These citizens pay her salary and her benefits. She doesn’t get to pick and choose which citizens she is going to deny.