Correct.
Sneaks questions was: "“I wouldn’t deny mail-in voting for anybody. Would you?”
You appear to be saying that no not anybody could vote by mail, but only for approved reasons. That means that not anyone can vote by mail, therefore some fall outside your “restrictions”.
Why is it so hard to honestly answer Sneak’s question? Yes you would not let everyone vote by mail-in ballot.
WW
How?
What would show that? Ballots don’t have names on them.
1 Like
WuWei
882
I suspect this whole show is about The Big Lie.
johnwk2
885
I have no idea what you mean.
WuWei
886
The show you© are putting on about mail-in voting.
johnwk2
887
Well, the “show” you mention is about a Judge overturning an election in Connecticut because of ballot harvesting, and mail-in ballot box stuffing. It certainly is not about “The Big Lie,” you mention.
johnwk2
891
Getting back to the subject of the thread . . .
the irrefutable fact is, mail-in voting unlocks a nefarious vulnerability in which ballots can, and have been, counted of voters not qualified to vote, and of voters who are qualified but did not fill out the ballot and make the choices thereon. Why, therefor, is there such an advocacy for no-excuse mail-in voting, by a number of so-called and well-funded, “public interest” groups?
JWK
The troubling truth with allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.
1 Like
How many cases of this?
How many cases of this?
Because it is convenient and allows for more people to vote.
60 million mail in votes in 2020. Let’s see your data that I requested above to see if there is fraud.
Like I said above, if 1 million mail in votes in 2020 were fraudulent… that would still mean mail in voting was 98% safe. If 100k were fraudulent… that’s 99% safe.
We will never get to 100%, so what is an acceptable margin for fraud?
You said there were. Evidence, cases, examples. You said this
This means there are examples. How many out of 60 million?
Same question here. Any examples?
johnwk2
895
The irrefutable fact is, mail-in voting unlocks a nefarious vulnerability in which ballots can, and are, counted of voters not qualified to vote, and of voters who are qualified but did not fill out the ballot and make the choices thereon.
From your first link…
“Investigators tell the paper they don’t consider the discrepancy fraudulent; the number of votes attributed to deceased voters is too small and their votes are spread out over more than two dozen elections.”
From your third link…
“In today’s statement, his office noted 630 cases of alleged voter fraud in the state during his tenure since 2018, while also noting election crimes are “exceedingly rare.”
And none of these have anything to do with mail in ballots. But let me grant you that. Let’s say all of these instances are verified voter fraud via mail in.
Out of 60 million mail in votes in 2020… these represent about a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of the total number of votes.
How much more inconvenient do you want to make voting to tackle, for example, .000001% of fraud?
johnwk2
897
So, are we now in agreement that mail-in voting unlocks a nefarious vulnerability in which ballots can, and are, counted of voters not qualified to vote, and of voters who are qualified but did not fill out the ballot and make the choices thereon?
