It’s a deflection, again accusing others for the same activity the accuser is engaging in.

1 Like

I was listening to Leahey,Whine-house, Blumenthal and Booker on the satellite in the truck. With no visual, Leahey sounded like he had a pint of scotch in him. Whine-house was advancing money conspiracies again; (look whose talking). Booker? I heard Booker reference his time “as mayor” of Newark and his business experience. Other than raising taxes Booker was a half decent mayor lowering crime but, maybe he should have stayed on as mayor?
Blumenthal? I’m not a fan. I have a tough time with those who lie about military service especially VN.

2 Likes

Throughout our country, in politics…from Mayors to Senators, as well as the social media giants, the preponderance of all the main stream media, our academic systems, internal terrorist organizations and so many other forces all working to tear our country apart of it’s founding core values that made this country the greatest country on earth.

What were our founding core values?

1 Like

Deviation from the Narrative is wrongspeak. Physical contact other than punching is collaboration.

Trump is divisive!

You really believe that?

I believe the Constitution is for all of us. The difference being that blacks and other minorities had to fight for it.

Which should make us appreciate it even more.

So?

I’m not even religious but I can understand someone’s viewpoint being based in a religious creed.

What do non-religious men such as we base our convictions on? And are our convictions superior to those based on belief in a deity?

No. Ours are no better or worse.

1 Like

As did whites.

At its creation? Yep

Yes NOW. I’m questioning the intent.

What is your question?

No. However, if your conviction is based upon a “higher authority” you may believe that your conviction has more weight than a non-believer. People invoke god to dismiss the convictions of others.

What is your conviction based on?

You will learn something if you read.

With any luck, Judge Barrett will wake up Justice Barrett next Tuesday morning.

Can’t happen.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

Not only can it, it will.

Highly unlikely.

#1 If the vote is Monday, ACB would not be Judge Barratt when going to bed, she would be Justice Barrett going to bed. Therefore Judge Barrett wouldn’t wake up as Justice Barrett.

#2 If the vote (currently scheduled for Monday) doesn’t happen until Tuesday, then Judge Barrett would go to bed and Judge Barrett would wake up. Not becoming Justice Barrett until sometime Tuesday after the Senate convenes for business.

.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

Good Lord. The vote is Monday night. Even if she goes to bed Justice Barrett, she will wake up Justice Barrett Tuesday morning.

What a petty, pedantic post.

3 Likes

I’ve not seen where it was scheduled for Monday night. I’ve seen that McConnell has scheduled it for Monday.

#1 Why do you assume it will be in the middle of the night?

#2 How are you clued into ACB’s personal bed time?

#3 The post doesn’t even bother to point out that if the vote were to be in the middle of the night and she is confirmed as expected, that Judge Barrett would go to bed and wake up and still be Judge Barrett. She doesn’t become Justice Barrett until signed off by the President and then takes the Oath of Office as a SCOTUS Justice.

:slight_smile:
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS