Of course, you don’t understand my point because you dismiss the importance and application of the Sixth Amendment in the Trump case.
In regard to your comment that, “If you don’t raise it pre- or during trial, you may lose the right to appeal…” “may” is the operative word and in Trump’s case that protection still exists if it is invoked.
The bottom line is, it seems both juries [the one which indicted Trump and the one finding Trump guilty, may have been hoodwinked by the prosecution and done so beyond constitutional limits and protections.
We’ll see about that. Prediction - this argument loses in the NY appeals and SCOTUS rejects certiorari because the NY decisions are not a manifest misapplication of federal constitutional law. They will also reject the theories of original jurisdiction propounded by the likes of Mark Levin because those are foreclosed by, inter AliaMarbury v Madison and Texas v Pennsylvania.
The jury heard from a man who went to prison for his part of this crime so how could they logically think the crime was too vague for Trump to prosecute.
Cohen was guilty of false business records and election interference but ultimately he was paid by Trump for doing it.
Yup. In your world the Sixth Amendment doesn’t apply to political opponents in New York City which has been turned into a rat, garbage, crime and terrorist filled ■■■■ hole.
Tammany Hall tyrants are alive and doing well in New York.
No but it established motive as being political so therefore the Stormy payment was too.
He made up stories and had them printed so if he could do that its not difficult to believe he paid Stormy for the same reason.
what do you call it when you pay a lawyer for his services and expenses? Most people would call it “legal expenses”. There were no false business records, and oddly enough, nowhere in the jury instructions were they ever told to determine if the entries were even false.