Where is this democrat party you speak of?
Well that is certainly a novel take on why Lazarro was picked up for trafficking minors for sex.
What business arrangement led to manager handing a Russian intelligence officer internal polling data?
This Anton Lazarro?
polling data is polling data and any campaign can share it with whomever they desire. and yes, it is the same guy, nothing has ever been proven about stone. allegations are not proof of anything.
1 Like
It isn’t the same guy.
Manafort was the campaign manager that turned over inside Party data to Russian Intelligence… funny how some just shrug that one off like no big deal.
Roger Stone was the go between with Trump and Guccifer 2.0.
try reading and maybe understanding what’s written. might help.
Yeah… that guy. His helper in trafficking women got picked up also
But the real tragedy is that a super sketchy theory with evidence supplied by an alleged sex trafficker can’t enter into the right wing news cycle now.
please keep the melodrama going. stone was a private citizen who had contacts with some guy (gucifer) that he was unaware may have been a russian intel asset only because it was a conduit to wikileaks that did nothing he asked them to do, either through gucifer or directly. his contact with the campaign on the matter amounts to “something is coming out soon”. it does not amount to any collusion between the campaign and russia.
thats because it is no big deal. its their data, they can do what they want with it.
There is no collusion because Stone might not have known that Guccifer 2.0 was GRU or Manafort might not have known that he was passing off insider information to Russian Intelligence is a great argument.
There are no holes in that I tells ya
I would love to see this applied to literally anything else.
Like anything.
Say the Biden campaign give China a ton of inside information and then we find that China launched a highly targeted disinformation campaign for Joe Biden’s benefit.
No biggie… it’s their data… they can give it to the commies if they want…
Says absolutely nobody.
maybe if the fbi had briefed trump it would be different, but they were busy pulling for hillary spreading the fake dossier around to get fraudulent wire taps on innocent people
1 Like
This is the funny thing about that… it was John McCain under the advisement of Lindsey Graham who passed the Steele Dossier off to the FBI.
lol… highly targeted disinformation campaign" too funny. a few fake news stories from a farm in fl that almost no-one ever saw. what did they spend? 30K or something like that.
Yep… highly targeted.
They didn’t have to spend that much money because they knew exactly who to target with what messages.
yes, john mclame, the democrats best friend. didn’t like him then, opinion hasn’t changed.
and the fbi already had it by way of nellie ohr
1 Like
lol, targeting people who were already voting for trump. tell us please, what was the official finding on whether the “interference” had any effect on the elections outcome? i can help you with that if you like.
1 Like
It wasn’t just targeting people who were already voting for Trump.
But this is getting away from the whole bonkers notion that a campaign manager for a major political party can hand off inside party information directly to a hostile foreign intelligence service and it is no big deal.
It is wild the lengths that some will go to excuse what we all know is wrong.
Because it was never glossed over, but repeated over and over again (along with that meaningless meeting in Trump tower) as the proof of collusion. Both things that Mueller looked at without conclusion.
1 Like
