Says the guy with the bright shiny colored emotions.
It’s fine.
WuWei
443
There is no doubt, none, that executives in several states used (abused) the Ronasteria to declare emergency actions for voting qnd created an environment more favorable for the DNC in so doing.
2 Likes
I’m sorry it hurts that The Loser lost every single one of the post election 60+ court cases desperately filed in attempt to steal and fraud his election loss. It was nothing short of pathetic. Truly maga at its finest.
Lol that “pronouncement”.
Hmmm, I bet you’re only saying that happened in the states that The Felon lost.
Typical.
its what eventually happened. the end result is that the ballots Trump wanted to not be counted in 2020, were in fact not counted in 2022 because they violated PA election law and the constitution of PA. All the spin in that article about how they “probably” would not have effected 2020 is just spin. They don’t know because he was denied the chance to even make the argument and the court refused to do what he asked and segregate the ballots.
1 Like
Actually, that isn’t the case at all. What’s really going on here is that as a Trump supporter, it is inconceivable someone wouldn’t support Trump as they do. The only possible explanation is that the person must be unable to think for themselves and thus is being influenced by those on the left. Once the non-supporter of Trump is brought back to their senses, then they too will see the light.
Kind of humorous when you think about it. 
2 Likes
Were Republicans not allowed to use mail in ballots?
1 Like
to lose a case, it has to be heard. None of them were. All were dismissed on technicalities, some of those technicalities were absurd.
WuWei
452
No. I am simply reading your posts. You are parroting the left narrative.
I don’t support Trump.
Trump shouldn’t be within 500 miles of the oval office. Emotionally.
Objectively, he is in my best interest.
2 Likes
I don’t know what this means in the context of my question.
Were republicans allowed to use mail in ballots? Yes or no?
Seriously?
So, my disdain for Trump can only be rooted in LW narrative? Once again, you are implying that I am unable to think for myself. If I don’t much care for Trump, there can only be one explanation. It must be the LIBs. 
Semantics.
If the cases had merit, they would have been heard. If there was some technicality, then resolve it and retry. Most of the technicalities were essentially “lack of evidence”.
So yes he didn’t lose those 60ish cases. He actually never made it into the stadium to compete but still claims to be the winner
1 Like
and you are the one that keeps trotting out reasons directly cut and pasted from the leftist narrative.
you don’t like Trump and don’t like his bombastic style. That’s cool, you don’t have to. So why keep trotting out the leftist narratives?
2 Likes
WuWei
457
I think you do.
Do the measures taken by the govsterians provide equal outcomes for both parties.
WuWei
458
No, it’s rooted in your emotions. The narrative is feeding them.
1 Like
WuWei
459
Oh, I’m going to remember this!
completely false. In PA alone the technicalities were
- its too early
- its not ripe yet
- its too late
damn… just couldn’t hit the sweet spot!
and then two years later decided another case on EXACTLY the terms Trump was asking for.
The many of the cases were dismissed for lack of standing (it wasn’t Trump who filed them). The only judge who cited a lack of evidence, also did not allow an evidentiary hearing where he may have seen whatever evidence the plaintiff claimed to have, and then dismissed the case based on timeliness, not a lack of evidence (that he never allowed to be introduced).
4 Likes
Yes. In Every state that allowed mail in ballots, all people who were registered were able to get one. Right?
1 Like
