If Cohen brings another bucket of chicken, Hank Johnson swears Guam will tip over.
2 Likes
Oh good, moonbeam Swalwell has the floor. This will be enlightening.
Barr getting his ass handed to him by Swalwell.
Rep. Swalwell to AG Bill Barr: “You don’t read the president’s tweets? Well you should start, because there’s a lot of evidence in them.“
Swalwell: You said tweets make your job impossible, Your job only is impossible if you enable the president.
WuWei
27
Evidence of what? It’s a stupid statement.
1 Like
Ever heard Swalwell make a statement that wasn’t stupid?
Nadler has become the Dems “Baghdad Bob”
Swalwell should be the future AG in the Biden administration.
You have got to be kidding me? Wow!
Rep. Cicilline: “Is it ever appropriate for the president to accept or solicit foreign assistance in an election?”
AG Barr: “Depends on what kind of assistance.”
Does this mean you guys are gonna day the president can now move the date of an election and it’s okay? Lol
WuWei
33
They are trying to make Barr counter media reports by not answering the questions.
Jayapal brought up the NG Major’s testimony.
Camp
34
This is all politics. The D won’t let Barr talk. Every one of them just talk over him with gross mis characterizations.
Sad to watch…Same MO as impeachment.
komobu
35
Jayapal is just plain out there…But she is in control! LOL
Camp
36
R time is spent allowing Barr to refute the lies of the previous D Inquisitor.
Jayapal tearing Barr a new one.
Smyrna
38
This is nothing but lib “speachment” hearing. 
2 Likes
Camp
39
Easy to do when you run your mouth with falsehoods and don’t let the other party talk.
Unimpressed. Loudest voice wins argument.
Barr temling the truth for the first time today.
Hopefully trump will hear this opinion from his own AG.
https://twitter.com/msnbc/status/1288183451032662017?s=21
1 Like
tweets are evidence? LOL. what a moron
You can disagree all you want, but they are official statements from the President of the United States.
1 Like
Why wouldn’t they be? Part of the Miranda wording is that anything you say can be held against you in a court of law. The format / medium in which you say it is irrelevant