I find it hard to believe you would think I’m a LIB, given the number of threads I’ve participated in over the years, espousing conservative ideology.
It is important to remember that disagreements about election fraud and ethics probes have nothing to do with one’s political ideology.
Maybe you might be inclined to clue me in some day. 
I don’t think you are a Lib. What I said is that you post like a Lib. Just an observation …
You’ve yet been unable to describe how a LIB posts. I would really like to know.
It’s like pornography … you can’t define it, but you know it when you see it. 
I’ve shared my forum experience with you, from both liberal and conservative forums. I’ve found that human behavior, not political ideology, is more responsible for one’s posting persona.
Let’s take your recent display of arrogance. I’ve encountered my share of that behavior over the years from both those on the right and from those on the left.
In any case, the next time you find an instance where you believe I’m posting like a LIB, please feel free to point it out. We can then discuss it together. 
i didn’t profess either of those things, lying about what other posters post… another lib trait
the founders neither enumerated it, nor discussed it. Trying to discern an “intent” is akin to reading tea leaves and anyone claiming they can is a liar with an agenda. The only thing we have is what they wrote, and it does not preclude self pardon.
Now what Trump cannot do, is pardon himself and continue to claim innocence. Accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt. Claiming innocence is the same as refusing the pardon.
Mmmmmmm
Yeah, the law.
Removing the context may allow you to pretend I said something I did not, but it does not change what i did say within the context i said it. kind of the same thing you’ve done with “subject to the jurisdiction”.
dishonest, petty, and still wrong
And yet you are doing exactly the same thing again in your very next post.
I’m trying really hard not to laugh. I really am…
Oh hell. 
I didn’t remove it, I changed it.
Principles and fundamentals are such precisely because they hold true across contexts.
complete ■■■■■■■■
dishonest, petty, and still wrong.
Thank goodness for the FOIA and Judicial Watch!
Da-Da-Dump-Dump-Dump
Another one bites the dust.
Now whoever could have predicted the lawfare cases would all implode?
