If you are mind numbingly stupid in college, it doesn’t generally improve from there. She wrote a paper advocating Americans do, what they were already doing, ie be below replacement level in births. That happened back in 1974.

30 years ago? C’mon.

Yep, I concur college is much more about indoctrination than critical thinking.

1 Like

30 years ago she was advocating “green” policies. Today she’s advocating “green” policies, and we’re supposed to believe her views have changed?

1 Like

Sure. We all know that is an idealistic age. And for older folks, changes in views still happen after THIRTY years.

But I apologize, I didn’t mean to interrupt your frothing over the outrage du jour

i’m hardly frothing, just amazed at the level of denial. her overall viwe has not changed, she is still supporting the same climate master. biden nominated her and sans some reason that would make her unfit to serve he is entitled to his own people.

Dude, all due respect, but the right is always frothing.

This isn’t someone being sorry about putting on blackface like 30 years ago.

This is her education…it’s what she actually thinks.

Do you believe everything you believed in 30 years ago? If so, read a book. Mebbe two.

Who knows? Maybe she still thinks this. That is what hearings are for. But to try to burn her with a thing she wrote 30 years ago is just pathetic.

1 Like

Congratulations…you just stated someone’s actual education doesn’t mean anything.

That’s like saying "Mein Kampf; doesn’t tell you one damned thing about Hitler. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I don’t hold the same opinions that I held 30 years ago.

30 years ago I was way into Ayn Rand.

I have since ejected such nonsense

she writes fiction

youre off to a good start!

Did you write a college thesis on her? Is that paper the basis for your masters or doctorate?

Big difference between being a fan of someone, and it being the framework of your education don’t you think?

I did write a thesis on how “Time Bandits”, “Brazil”, and “The Adventures of Baron Munchausen” was made as a trilogy representing childhood, middle age and the older years desire to regain youth…. But having seen Terry Gilliam’s work post “The Fisher King” I don’t believe it was intentional anymore.

So it was something you wrote for a creative writing class. Or was it English lit?

Do you not see the difference between that, and a thesis for your masters or doctorate?

I have a theater degree from an engineering school.

Quite lame I know.

Still pull down six figures in the entertainment industry. Solid blue collar dude in NYC.

The point is that it stupid to hold someone to their opinions that they held 30 years ago.

They are likely a different person now.

Don’t be ridiculous

And what you wrote was based on your intrepretations of Ann Rynd’s work…and wasn’t a research paper published for a masters of doctorate correct?

I’m just trying to get you to see the difference is all.

If the only thing that is bad about her is a thesis that she wrote 30 years ago… then the point is that it is a huge yawn.

No one cares.

Were it not a masters or doctorate paper, yeah.

That is like saying ‘Mein Kampf’ doesn’t tell you a damned thing about Hitler.