IT BEGINS: Cortez Says ‘ULTRA WEALTHY’ Will Pay for Universal Healthcare, Free Education | Sean Hannity

Janet_Miller · 2018-07-28T18:00:30.573Z

www.ocasio2018.com

The Original Post doesn’t even start to cover some of this woman’s goals.

Guaranteed federal jobs, really? Do we really want someone whose loyalties may lie elsewhere in some of these positions? Or someone whose debt or other desperate situation may cause them to bypass quality on the job, or the rules of the job? Really?

And do we really want people lacking education for those jobs—for example, someone without a degree in the social sciences or related field—working, say, in law enforcement? Probation?

There is a reason these jobs require such an extensive clearance to get, & they already offer some of the benefits she wants them to, like health care &, in some agencies, daycare.

Per one source there is a big discrepancy in costs of Medicare for All—not sure why so many love Medicare as it pays less than private insurance, motivating some physicians to reject it—but there is a big difference between Bernie Sanders’ $14,000,000 & her $2,000,000.

Let New Yorkers have her. I for one don’t want to see her goals tried elsewhere.

Janet_Miller · 2018-07-28T18:02:15.322Z

Making arguments personal defeats any merit their political opinions have, IMO.

Samson_Corwell · 2018-07-28T20:40:03.874Z

No. I absolutely want her in Congress. She is very vocal on ending mandatory arbitration and private prisons.

Dale_Witty · 2018-07-28T21:08:05.995Z

Ultra Wealthy? I don’t think that will last long.

George_Adams · 2018-07-29T03:03:11.516Z

http://www.impartialnewsnetwork.com/

fallenturtle · 2018-08-01T18:46:55.422Z

I’ve yet to hear of anyone under a progressive tax system that would prefer to be lower income vs rich to avoid the “penalty” of a higher tax rate.

Interested · 2018-08-05T18:36:54.730Z

Besides, Medicare isn’t free! Seniors pay about $140/mo. taken out of Social Security benefits and that covers 80% of Hospital, medical. So they pay about $175 for a second Policy to cover the other 20%. Then They pay about $35 mo. for prescription drug coverage. That’s about $350/mo. And, guess what! THATS PER PERSON! that’s worse than Obamacare for the Average family!

enubus18 · 2018-08-06T01:01:57.535Z

Liberal superstar??? She got 17,000 votes in a low turnout district. If you listen to her, she she should ask for a refund on her college education at Boston college. she knows nothing, she learned nothing and she was propagandized for 4 years, with loony Bernie Commie claptrap!

koushi_shinigami · 2018-08-09T12:26:53.298Z

Sounds to me like she qualifies as a star of the libs.

koushi_shinigami · 2018-08-09T12:30:48.747Z

mobulis:

Because a flat tax isn’t fair.

Wht not?

…

mobulis · 2018-08-09T14:28:02.779Z

koushi_shinigami:

Wht not?

…

Because it doesn’t hurt equally.

koushi_shinigami · 2018-08-09T16:11:21.145Z

mobulis:

Because it doesn’t hurt equally.

And that is the purpose of taxation – to cause pain?

mobulis · 2018-08-09T16:31:59.245Z

koushi_shinigami:

And that is the purpose of taxation – to cause pain?

With a flat tax the richer you are the less it will affect you, and that’s wrong.

koushi_shinigami · 2018-08-09T17:18:24.948Z

mobulis:

With a flat tax the richer you are the less it will affect you, and that’s wrong.

If the country received all the funds it needs to satisfy all its financial obligations, then why would it be wrong to ‘affect richer people less than poorer people’? This makes no sense unless your goal is to punish success due to class envy.

With a flat tax the wealthy will automatically be paying more money in taxes than poor people. Why do you want to financially hurt them?

mobulis · 2018-08-09T17:59:25.934Z

koushi_shinigami:

If the country received all the funds it needs to satisfy all its financial obligations, then why would it be wrong to ‘affect richer people less than poorer people’? This makes no sense unless your goal is to punish success due to class envy.

With a flat tax the wealthy will automatically be paying more money in taxes than poor people. Why do you want to financially hurt them?

If after paying taxes their lifestyle has not changed then their taxes are not too high.

koushi_shinigami · 2018-08-09T18:10:38.299Z

mobulis:

If after paying taxes their lifestyle has not changed then their taxes are not too high.

You are not answering the question.

Why do you want to see their lifestyle change? Would that somehow be beneficial to the country? If so then how?

mobulis · 2018-08-09T19:11:57.860Z

koushi_shinigami:

mobulis:

If after paying taxes their lifestyle has not changed then their taxes are not too high.

You are not answering the question.

Why do you want to see their lifestyle change? Would that somehow be beneficial to the country? If so then how?

Whatever the percentage the tax is, any detrimental effect will be greater the less wealth you have. So the rich can afford to be taxed more without detrimental effects.

koushi_shinigami · 2018-08-09T19:17:34.347Z

Why do you want there to be a detrimental effect on anyone? In this case you want to penalize the wealthy. Why? Are you really that jealous of the success of others? When you go out to dinner and you split the check, do you divide it according to the income of each person there?

Would you be in favor of a tax system in which everyone ended up with the same result. After taxes everyone has $12,000 income for the year. those who earn less would receive money from the government, those who make more would give all above $12,000 in taxes. In your mind would that be a fair system?

mobulis · 2018-08-09T19:32:00.505Z

koushi_shinigami:

Why do you want there to be a detrimental effect on anyone? In this case you want to penalize the wealthy. Why? Are you really that jealous of the success of others? When you go out to dinner and you split the check, do you divide it according to the income of each person there?

Would you be in favor of a tax system in which everyone ended up with the same result. After taxes everyone has $12,000 income for the year. those who earn less would receive money from the government, those who make more would give all above $12,000 in taxes. In your mind would that be a fair system?

No I wouldn’t, but I am in favor of a income cap of one million a year after taxes.

koushi_shinigami · 2018-08-09T19:38:36.834Z

mobulis:

No I wouldn’t

Why not? Everyone would have the same results from their labor. Wouldn’t that be fair? And the rich would suffer more under that system. Isn’t that what you want to happen?