I was thinking about this, if for some reason a girl from my high school (I gratuated in the 80’s) made a claim that I tried to rape her, how the heck could I disprove it? Honestly how would I or you or anyone disprove decades old claims? Because of this I don’t see why anyone who may be hell bent on lying should have any concern at all of facing legal action.
It would seem that such a tactic could easily be used against any man not just seeking political office but also high profile or high paying positions in the business world as well.
If I had multiple qualified candidates to choose from, I probably wouldn’t go with the one that had multiple women accusing them of engaging in sexual misconduct.
Hair found weeks later in cars have been found. Regarding semen, skin, blood, I’m not sure. I occasionally watch the ID channel on cable and you would be amazed at how they can crack cases with DNA evidence.
Your first question did not stipulate that the investigation would start two weeks after the incident. You only asked if it could be proven two weeks later. So if the DNA evidence is collected within the required time, then yes it can be proven two weeks later.
Aren’t references generally part of the job interview process?
So if someone in your prospective employee’s past said they were routinely abusing alcohol and forcing themselves on women, that wouldn’t influence your opinion at all?
