Is this worth saving?

[WuWei]

@SottoVoce

I’m going to stop there because you are factually wrong. A president cannot “write law.” I never said DACA was an EO (go back and read my posts, I’ll wait). DACA was an executive action via a Homeland Security (executive branch, under control of the president) memorandum.

Which is effectively the exact same thing as an EO.

[Roxiebelle]

The Democrat Party and the principle killers of liberty & freedom…LIBERALISM.

[WuWei]

@Konssurvative1

Why ? Is it going to do something to me?

It can lead you down the path to an error trap.

[WuWei]

@SottoVoce

I’m accounting for all possibilities.

Impossible. And you were projecting context. We all have that tendency.

Think about a person barricaded in a concrete building.

[WuWei]

@lessright

What’s to continue. It was a yes or no question.

I thought for a minute you were going to correct the myth of the Articles.

[WuWei]

@Roxiebelle

The Democrat Party and the principle killers of liberty & freedom…LIBERALISM.

Come on Roxie. This isn’t a bumper sticker thread.

[WuWei]

Man! I have to go to bed. Great discussion. I really appreciate the civility and the great posts.

Hopefully we can continue tomorrow.

[WuWei]

@Kuta

Two of the last three presidents have been minority popularity vote presidents. That often leads to dictatorial rule when the minority parity can no longer achieve rule.

No it doesn’t. But thanks for explaining.

[lessright]

Minority PARTY. That’s a horse of different color.

[WuWei]

@lessright

Minority PARTY. That’s a horse of different color.

No. Not party.

[lessright]

Close enough.

[Konssurvative1]

My bad. Just that i found nothing about who EOs are given to…and dont have much desire to go looking tonight

[CanadianJudo]

but just normal medicare isn’t socialism?

[Konssurvative1]

Ok. Yeah they become part of federal regulations. I thought you meant they were given to someone in general

[Konssurvative1]

I’m not afraid of making an error. It’s one way of learning.

[ImRightYoureWrong]

@altair1013

Medicare for all is also a lie. If it were not, then AOC would be the first one to give up her congressional plan in exchange for Medicare. Medicare for all means Medicare, and Medicare only for you. They have something better in mind for themselves.

Yea totally lets not think about the millions of other people in this country because AOC makes you angry. You do realize that other countries woth socialized health care still have private sectors? I mean, I understand some people’s lives revolve around clinging to the radio and shaking their fists at CEC derived demons, but guaranteeing health insurance for all US citizens is a bit more important than your obsession over some silly hypothetical that isnt backed by reality, regarding what politicians may or may not do in whatever system you are conjuring

[MarkyS]

Yes and no.

It competes with medical insurance but it doesn’t entirely replace it, as medicare for All does. Medicare for All is government takeover of medical insurance and notihng but.

M

[Mountain_Soldier]

@SottoVoce

@altair1013

@SottoVoce

“One party?” What are you insinuating? Make Trump king/dictator? Put all those damn liberals in work camps?

It’s not polite to jump ahead with your own question before answering mine. Should we remain a free republic as the founders intended? Answer this and I promise to follow up.

Yes. Bring on the snarky “Democrats are socialists/communists who hate freedom.”

Only on certain issues.

[CanadianJudo]

Why would insurance go away Medicare for all doesn’t cover everything its simply basic / emergency coverage.

I have universal healthcare.
and private health insurance.

[ImRightYoureWrong]

Because everything is overdramatized / uninformed when it comes to right wing media’s coverage of socialized medicine