Because….
Liberal + January 6 = Yes you will rot in jail and no we don’t recognize your stupid civil rights. (And yes we are too arrogant or dumb to recognize it could happen to us someday)
This is dangerous ■■■■■
4 Likes
It is dangerous. Very much so.
If they with held or destroyed evidence that would have helped the defendant then the defendant should be released.
Prosecutors are supposed to make all evidence available to the defense not with hold or destroy it.
That is misconduct.
1 Like
This is from Cornell Law school…I’m not a lawyer so I thought I’d learn more.
“The Brady rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, requires prosecutors to disclose material, exculpatory information in the government’s possession to the defense. Brady material, or the evidence the prosecutor is required to disclose under this rule, includes any information favorable to the accused which may reduce a defendant’s potential sentence, go against the credibility of an unfavorable witness, or otherwise allow a jury to infer against the defendant’s guilt.
Initially, the Brady rule was only applicable if the defendant made a pretrial request for specific information which the prosecution denied. In United States v. Bagley, however, the Supreme Court eliminated this request requirement and stated that the prosecution has a constitutional duty to disclose all material, favorable information in their possession to defendants regardless of whether it is requested. This duty is breached regardless of whether that information is withheld intentionally or unintentionally.
If a Brady rule violation is discovered during trial, the court can either declare a mistrial or prohibit the prosecution from using unfavorable evidence which could be discredited by the withheld information. Because the Brady rule inherently involves a lack of information on the side of the defense, however, violations of the Brady rule are typically only discovered after the defendant is already convicted. As a result, the most common outcome of a Brady rule violation is overturning that conviction.” Brady rule | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Certainly seems this is happening a lot re: 1-6-21.
3 Likes
Don’t forget the GOP Never Trumpers who are right there with the leftists screaming “insurrection!”
2 Likes
Score! What was Epps and the fbi doing on the recently released videos? Thanks in advance
Good question.
Epps wasn’t where he claimed.
Where was he on the video? Anywhere?
In the middle of the frame of the new one in a crowd of black. Really stood out. Looked like he was everywhere exhorting people to go inside. Notice how he stays just behind the barrier shakers.
Looked like he got along well with cap PD.
He was trespassing at 2:41…It’s on the video here…
1 Like
And what did he tell the J6 Committee under oath?
“Epps told the committee that he never entered the Capitol, and therefore never committed a crime,” Carlson said. “Text messages show that at 2:12 p.m., he boasted to his nephew that he had ‘orchestrated the protests at the Capitol.’”
Epps told lawmakers on the House panel that when he sent the text messages to his nephew, he had already left the Capitol for his hotel room.
“That is not true,” Carlson said. “The surveillance footage we found shows that in fact, Ray Epps remained at the Capitol for at least another half an hour.”
“What was Epps doing there? We can’t say,” Carlson added. “But we do know that he lied to investigators. The January 6th Committee likely knew this too. Democrats had access to the same tape, yet they defended Ray Epps.”
2 Likes
