I think the Due Process Clause should be thought of as allowing the Supreme Court to review some issues. They did that for habeas corpus for the Gitmo detainees.
Are you a lawyer?
Not yet. I am in law school at the moment.
refusal to let DACA be repealed
Refusalt to expand on Obama’s orders on restricting people from certain countries
List goes on and on.
More to the point, judges and Justices whose written opinions are repeatedly determined to not be in harmony with the text and legislative intent of our constitution ___ as expressed during its framing and ratification process, which gives context to its text ___ ought to be removed from their office of public trust, and punished for their abuse of a public trust, meaning, malfeasance, misfeasance and nonfeasance.
”The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands [our 9th Circuit Court of Appeals] . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” ___ Madison, Federalist Paper No. 47
The stupidest question ever asked, and racist …