Was who charged? There are a lot of witches in Trump’s coven, some have been indicted and more indictments to come. Flynn probably violated the Logan Act but he copped a plea and so the final charges are a shadow of what he was facing… not a basis for inferring anything. My point was that there are some circumstances (not all) where a conversation with Russian officials can be illegal. Are you disagreeing with the point or just making noise?
Don’t know. Do you have access to each piece of testimony he has given under oath? I doubt it. What we do know is that he lied to the public repeatedly about the Trump Tower meeting. That leads some of us to doubt his credibility but for others this pattens of lying does not appear to raise any qualms at all. It is a matter of personal taste, I suppose.
Already answered. No. He took a plea bargain and the charges were adjusted accordingly. A plea bargain gets the defendant lesser charges. Why do you keep asking this question?
I suspect he’s trying to get at the fact that the Logan Act has never been used to sucessfully prosecute anyone - and has only been tried twice, most recently 170 years ago.
It’s also never been ruled on, and could likely be unconstitutional.
I mentioned it in a list of ways in which an interaction with a Russian official can be illegal, in response to a broad claim that it is not “illegal to talk to Russians.” The statement was relevant as a response to that assertion. Don’t take my word for it. Go back and read that portion of the thread.