Ok. Then if you don’t want hypotheticals, we don’t know what Trump Jr would have done if he had come into information that Clinton had done something illegal with Russia.
You are right… we don’t know what they would have done… which is why I say things along the lines of “had they done so”
Out of curiosity, did you ever fight through an engagement(ambush) where half your company were casualties and later you took an enemy bullet, while serving with the rangers.
Ellis
WuWei: hwyflier:The man is an American hero, you say these things about him baselessly, and what for?
no he’s not.
Out of curiosity, did you ever fight through an engagement(ambush) where half your company were casualties and later you took an enemy bullet, while serving with the rangers.
Oh Sneaky will have something to say. You just wait. Hes got something
Jezcoe: DougBH:Strzok or McCabe? Or maybe just given it directly to the Hillary campaign.
What did McCabe do again that got him in trouble?
You think that Strzok would ignore direct evidence of Clinton making a quid pro quo deal with Russia while serving as Secretary of State?
We are not talking about direct evidence of Clinton making a quid pro quo deal with Russia. That was never available for Trump Jr to give to the FBI. The person who met with gave him junk and he tossed it. Of course it would have been available to the FBI if it had been available. The Trump campaign could not have used such information without it becoming public, if it had existed.
So we are talking about someone saying they wanted to meet and said they had information to provide…which they didn’t have. Why would Strzok, the guy who wanted insurance against Trump winning, try to chase that down?
Your position is based on the truthfulness of Donald Trump Jr. The same man who stated the meeting never happened, until he had to admit it did. The same man who stated the meeting was called to discuss adoption, until he had to admit it was called to discuss dirt on Hillary Clinton. That same man who lied about who was present, until he had to admit who was there.
But this time, his version is completely believable.
Fool me once: shame on you
Fool me twice: shame on me
Fool me three times: WITCH HUNT!
What else should it be based on? Imaginings of what went on in that meeting? Just because you can’t trust Trump Jr to tell the truth, that doesn’t mean you can just make up whatever you like and pretend it went on in that meeting.
Well, you can, but…
And lets not forget the email evidence of the meeting was that the woman had dirt on Hillary. That is corroboration of Trump Jrs statement.
theduke: WuWei: hwyflier:The man is an American hero, you say these things about him baselessly, and what for?
no he’s not.
Out of curiosity, did you ever fight through an engagement(ambush) where half your company were casualties and later you took an enemy bullet, while serving with the rangers.
Oh Sneaky will have something to say. You just wait. He’s got something
Ya, I think Sneakys days in the Rangers were well after the times they fought large scale fights against equally sized opponents.
What else should it be based on? Imaginings of what went on in that meeting? Just because you can’t trust Trump Jr to tell the truth, that doesn’t mean you can just make up whatever you like and pretend it went on in that meeting.
Well, you can, but…And lets not forget the email evidence of the meeting was that the woman had dirt on Hillary. That is corroboration of Trump Jrs statement.
Remember when it was just about Adoptions?
I never said he could be trusted, now did I? But you can’t just fill in the gaps with whatever you want.
They let Hillary bring 9 lawyers to her FBI interview, but told Flynn he didn’t need any…
Swamp!
I never said he could be trusted, now did I? But you can’t just fill in the gaps with whatever you want.
I wasn’t aware that @Vigilante was part of the prosecution team
The information is exposed one at a time, newest info is Lisa Page exposing Obama’s DOJ told the FBI to not prosecute Hillary.
Trump and the Republicans have been in control of the DOJ for over two years. Why hasn’t the DOJ under Trump prosecuted Hillary
Good thing because some Democrats were defending and protecting Obama and Hillary’s criminal activity, spygate fisagate. Lisa Page spilled the beans on Obama and his DOJ telling the FBI to not prosecute Hillary.
They let Hillary bring 9 lawyers to her FBI interview, but told Flynn he didn’t need any…
Did they disallow Flynn from bringing lawyers? Or did he make a choice? Is Flynn some baby who needs his hand held?
Come on Cratic, you aren’t even trying any longer.
They let Hillary bring 9 lawyers to her FBI interview, but told Flynn he didn’t need any…
And Flynn was stupid enough to believe them? Trump sure knows how to pick “only the best people”
DougBH:I never said he could be trusted, now did I? But you can’t just fill in the gaps with whatever you want.
I wasn’t aware that @Vigilante was part of the prosecution team
Yes. I suspect that he was not.
?
Chris:The information is exposed one at a time, newest info is Lisa Page exposing Obama’s DOJ told the FBI to not prosecute Hillary.
Trump and the Republicans have been in control of the DOJ for over two years. Why hasn’t the DOJ under Trump prosecuted Hillary
Good thing because some Democrats were defending and protecting Obama and Hillary’s criminal activity, spygate fisagate. Lisa Page spilled the beans on Obama and his DOJ telling the FBI to not prosecute Hillary.
Gee, this testimony is going on 3 years old now…
I wonder why Trump hasn’t used his DOJ to investigate these swamp dwellers, surely he’s had this information before now?
Q+ knows everything!
Yes. I suspect that he was not.
If not it seems awfully petty to tell him that he can’t form his own conclusions.
Ummmm…McCabe, Strzok and Page are all gone, now aren’t they?