Is the DNC rigging the primaries again

The DNC is claiming that Tulsa Gabbard has not met criteria to participate in the next debate by retroactively disqualifying polls in which she reached higher than 2% as being DNC unapproved.

"The campaign noted that Gabbard has exceeded 2 percent support in 26 national and early state polls but said only two of those are on DNC’s “certified” list, even as “many of the uncertified polls, including those conducted by highly reputable organizations such as The Economist and the Boston Globe, are ranked by Real Clear Politics and FiveThirtyEight as more accurate than some DNC ‘certified’ polls.”

“The Gabbard campaign is calling on the DNC to hold true to their promise and make adjustments to the process now to ensure transparency and fairness,” the campaign said in a Friday release.

“Crucial decisions on debate qualifications that impact the right of the American people to have the opportunity to participate fully in the Democratic process should not be made in secret by party bosses.”

The DNC raised the threshold to qualify for the upcoming September and October debates, requiring candidates to poll above 2 percent in four DNC-approved polls and raise money from at least 130,000 unique donors. "

Democrats don’t want a Trump reject littering the stage.


" Is the DNC rigging the primaries again ?"

Seems so. Most of the libs I know are already talking about supporting whichever piece of ■■■■ the DNC poops out this year. It’s as if they’ve already accepted the pick made for them. :wink:

So she wants them to change the rules to benefit her… they don’t want to and it is the DNC that is rigging things?


Sounds like she is trying to change and “rig” the rules to favor her.

debbie wasserman shultz - call your office!

Of course they are. They are picking. An old white dude over a woman of color.


She is a woman of color. Biden has white privilege, so the rules need to be different for her to make up for the centuries of oppression.

This is the 2016 results.
Trump - 306 points
Killary - 232 points

Pennsylvania - 20 points
Michigan - 16 points
Wisconsin - 10 points
(46 points)

306 - 46 = 260
232 + 46 = 278

If he loses Pennsylvania and Michigan, but keeps everything else he won last time, he wins reelection with 270 points.

If he loses all three, he loses re-election, becoming the first President to do so having won both Ohio and Florida.

This is why I always thank the libs for handing us Trump. He literally could not have done it without the Liberal Rust Belt (thanks again, libs! lol).

Pennsylvania is the only one of the three Rust Belt States that Trump really needs to keep hold of, which is why the DNC is rigging things in child-diddler Biden’s favor, being his home state and all.

I would ask who is they, but being an ardent Trump loyalist, you have no clue how things are shaking out.

So it looks like, bear with me now, that they would rather vote for an old white dude, the group they blame every ill in the world on, than stand by their beliefs.

Isn’t that the exact same thing they criticize those that voted for Trump for?

The will to power is a powerful thing.


Lets go down the list:

Old white dude
Rich white dude
Child predator
Hair sniffer
Pro-death penalty and harsh drug sentencing
Pro-mandatory minimum sentencing
Racist voting record
Anti-abortion voting record

This is everything libs claim to hate. They’ll now be supporting every bit of it just to win, for no other reason than, “Must. Support. Choice. Given.” :rofl:


So, you’re OK with the DNC having a secret list of credible pollsters and claiming that most of Tulsi Gabbard’s >2% support result happen not to be on that list, without them publishing that list up front?

No. The DNC claimed after the last presidential DNC scam, that they would have a more transparent system this time. However, they don’t want Democrat voters to choose their own candidate. The again want to force their own loser onto their party supporters.

She’s asking for the promised transparency.

Sounds like you guys are a little scared

1 Like

The DNC does know and doesn’t care what Democrats want. The DNC don’t want a patriot littering their stage.

I am. I’m scared libs don’t mean what they shriek. If they don’t, what’s the point of living?

If everyone else is making the cut, why should they change the rules?

1 Like

She should just switch parties and run as a republican. Seems like she will have a lot of success with that audience.

1 Like

She has multiple strikes against her. She won a Drudge poll:

And some in the media have made an issue of support by David Duke and Steve Bannon:

On top of that, she served in the military. That makes three strikes.