The DNC is claiming that Tulsa Gabbard has not met criteria to participate in the next debate by retroactively disqualifying polls in which she reached higher than 2% as being DNC unapproved.
"The campaign noted that Gabbard has exceeded 2 percent support in 26 national and early state polls but said only two of those are on DNCâs âcertifiedâ list, even as âmany of the uncertified polls, including those conducted by highly reputable organizations such as The Economist and the Boston Globe, are ranked by Real Clear Politics and FiveThirtyEight as more accurate than some DNC âcertifiedâ polls.â
âThe Gabbard campaign is calling on the DNC to hold true to their promise and make adjustments to the process now to ensure transparency and fairness,â the campaign said in a Friday release.
âCrucial decisions on debate qualifications that impact the right of the American people to have the opportunity to participate fully in the Democratic process should not be made in secret by party bosses.â
The DNC raised the threshold to qualify for the upcoming September and October debates, requiring candidates to poll above 2 percent in four DNC-approved polls and raise money from at least 130,000 unique donors. "
Seems so. Most of the libs I know are already talking about supporting whichever piece of â â â â the DNC poops out this year. Itâs as if theyâve already accepted the pick made for them.
If he loses Pennsylvania and Michigan, but keeps everything else he won last time, he wins reelection with 270 points.
If he loses all three, he loses re-election, becoming the first President to do so having won both Ohio and Florida.
This is why I always thank the libs for handing us Trump. He literally could not have done it without the Liberal Rust Belt (thanks again, libs! lol).
Pennsylvania is the only one of the three Rust Belt States that Trump really needs to keep hold of, which is why the DNC is rigging things in child-diddler Bidenâs favor, being his home state and all.
So it looks like, bear with me now, that they would rather vote for an old white dude, the group they blame every ill in the world on, than stand by their beliefs.
Isnât that the exact same thing they criticize those that voted for Trump for?
Old white dude
Rich white dude
Child predator
Hair sniffer
Pro-death penalty and harsh drug sentencing
Pro-mandatory minimum sentencing
Warmonger
Anti-cannabis
Racist voting record
Anti-abortion voting record
This is everything libs claim to hate. Theyâll now be supporting every bit of it just to win, for no other reason than, âMust. Support. Choice. Given.â
So, youâre OK with the DNC having a secret list of credible pollsters and claiming that most of Tulsi Gabbardâs >2% support result happen not to be on that list, without them publishing that list up front?
No. The DNC claimed after the last presidential DNC scam, that they would have a more transparent system this time. However, they donât want Democrat voters to choose their own candidate. The again want to force their own loser onto their party supporters.