WuWei
409
What’s the record for most candidates in a primary?
Libs hate it when you point out that they do the same things, and so do their leaders! Please don’t stop!
WuWei
411
1 Like
I didn’t say that. I lifted the quote from another post for context.
Do Trumpsters just lack fundamental reading skills.? Seems so…
That does not contradict Barr at all. You can accept 28 U.S.C., 515;28 C.F.R. 600.7 (a) for the purpose of executing prosecutorial jurisdiction and ALSO decide that there was not enough substantial unambiguous evidence to have followed through on a prosecution even if 28 U.S.C., 515;28 C.F.R. 600.7 (a) did not exist. Mueller wrote that in that way to provide an excuse for the Dem’s and media to interpret that as if he thought there was sufficient evidence but did not prosecute because of 28 U.S.C., 515;28 C.F.R. 600.7 (a). Barr discussed with Meuller which interpretation of those words was correct, and Mueller assured him that he was not saying that he would have prosecuted but for 28 U.S.C., 515;28 C.F.R. 600.7 (a).
The Dems, Nadler I think, asked if that discussion was memmorialised. He said, “Yes.” But when asked if the Dems could have a copy of that record he said, “No.” So he has evidence that his account of discussion with Meuller is correct, and that puts the ball in Mueller’s court as to whether he will testify to the House that Barr is lying when he suspects that Barr has a record that says otherwise.
OR… he was putting in that material to enable Democrats to infer that he would have prosecuted but for the convention, EVEN THOUGH he knew he still would not have been able to launch a winnable indictment. Both are possible reasons.
Yes. The Dems are going to waste the time running up to 2020 propping up their obvious fantasies instead of developing coherent policy planks. The’ll get to the election debates and realise they haven’t prepared themselves to respond intelligently to any of the questions real America is asking, and will be reduced to shouting “Racist!” and looking foolish.
It’s been explained a zillion times on here. It seems to be a bit painful reminder to some (the president included) that nearly 3 million people voted for Clinton. It’s like some cannot just be happy with their win.
Nothing makes me say it. I freely chose to say it. Mueller was a partisan who hired exclusively Clinton-sympathisers to investigate the Trump campaign. He did not bother to investigate the origins of the FBI investigation, nor the revelations in some media and by Comey to POTUS that the FISA warrants authorising surveillance of Trump associates were based at least in part on unverified and salacious material paid for by the DNC and sourced from Russians via Steele. That makes the Steele document relevant to his commission. But he ignored following up on those allegations.
IMO once Barr had committed to publishing as much as possible of Mueller’s report, Mueller’s team saw this as an opportunity to include allegations that they had not been able to verify, but which reflected badly on the President, and could be used by media and Democrats to further litigate his motives despite the final outcome of no charges being laid.
I’m just observing the available facts and connecting the dots.
Guvnah
420
It’s part of your thesis.
And Hillary lost.
Get over it.
Guvnah
421
This makes zero sense and is relatively fact-free.
1 Like
WuWei
423
I don’t know about facts, but it makes sense.
-
Mueller was a partisan
-
Mueller hired exclusively Clinton-sympathisers to investigate the Trump campaign.
-
Mueller did not bother to investigate the origins of the FBI investigation
-
Mueller did not bother to investigate the revelations in some media and by Comey to POTUS that the FISA warrants authorising surveillance of Trump associates were based at least in part on unverified and salacious material paid for by the DNC and sourced from Russians via Steele.
-
The genesis of the Steele document was relevant to Mueller’s commission.
-
Mueller ignored following up on those allegations.
Which of these points are not facts?
Tossing in foolish allegations doesn’t make other facts false.
