there is no “good percentage” few people will have any lasting effects. I know the liberal masters tell you to hype the virus up as much as possible, but the science just don’t match the panic.

Liberal masters again.

Keep on with the hilarity.

There is no need to hype a pandemic. We are living through the failure to respond to it right now.

Here’s some of the BS monkeying with the numbers they do. This is why I can’t take any of this seriously, if they need to distort the truth in order to make it look like a problem…it’s probably not a real problem.

In addition to those requirements, the CDC guidelines say that a person must test negative for the coronavirus twice, with the tests taken at least 24 hours apart.

So how many people actually have it? Who knows. In order to be considered “recovered” a person must be tested multiple times. But each time they test positive, it’s “counted” as a positive test result.

So when the stats for testing is discussed how man of those new numbers are just people getting repeat tested, and what’s the number of people infected…not how many positive tests.

1 Like

Come on, geez. You’re acting like having respiratory issues for the rest of your life is some type of big deal.

Sure it is

Severe cases of COVID-19 can cause lasting damage to the lungs that may necessitate surgery or even organ transplants.

No they aren’t.

“Can”. Conjecture.

“Treat”?

correct, we are living through it. you finally got one right!

some few severe cases, which are like less than .1% of cases before you realize its just a few of those. there is no large percentage, good percentage or even more than barely noticeable percentage

Got anything that backs up the assertion that only .1% of cases are severe cases? Heck the mortality rate alone is currently a lot higher than that at 4%