3571

Welcome to the forum. Here are the rules.

https://community.hannity.com/t/rules-of-the-forum/35011/17

Plagiarism is frowned upon.

3572

Protection for who? Certainly not for the unborn baby.

3 Likes
3573

You do realize that the comment of mine you responded to is over a year old.

:smile:

1 Like
3574

The Texas attorney generalā€™s office has filed an appeal with the state Supreme Court, effectively blocking a judgeā€™s hours-old order that temporarily lifted a ban on emergency abortions.

A day earlier, a Texas district judge had ruled in favor of a group of women and doctors who sued the state over medical exceptions in its abortion laws. The women argued that medical exceptions in the stateā€™s abortion bans lack clarity, putting patients in danger during medically complicated pregnancies.

The appeal blocks the judgeā€™s ruling in favor of the patients and doctors, for now, kicking the decision to the all-Republican state Supreme Court.

The judge had issued a temporary injunction prohibiting the laws from being enforced against health care professionals who provide abortions in emergency medical situations based on their ā€œgood faith judgment.ā€

Terrible legislation at the center of a judicial shootout on medical emergencies.

3575

In my opinion, there should be no shootout. The legislation should have accounted for medical emergencies. Self defense is a foundational principle of our legal system, and it should go without saying that saving the motherā€™s life is permissible.

I get what the TX legislature was trying to address, but these overreaches in abortion limitations are a big reason why voters are voting pro-abortion on statewide initiatives when given the opportunity.

1 Like
3576

In an emergency request, the Center for Reproductive Rights is asking a judge to allow Kate Cox to terminate her pregnancy after she received a lethal fetal diagnosis.

That paragraph makes me sick.

3577

Actually, it makes me sick, but on the opposite side of the issue.

I wish (itā€™s my hope, not my mandate) that parents of fatal-diagnosed in-utero babies would not view their child as something to dispose of. A mother whose child was killed in a car crash would want to have that one last moment of grief, holding her dead child. A mother whose 3-year-old child finally succumbs to some fatal condition will still want to hold her child one last time. She doesnā€™t choose to euthanize the child at age 2 when he gets diagnosed with the condition.

And I know many women who insisted on holding their stillborn babies right there in the delivery room.

However, law wonā€™t create that understanding in people. Our culture is not widely ready to adopt that view ā€“ that respect for the life that existed even for just a few months. Looking back in the thread, I see that I said something similar last summer. Abortion restrictions for now should not delve into the extreme cases, the heartwrenching cases, the (dare I say) poster-child cases. All those extremes do is create lightning rods that draw undue lightning to the larger issue.

1 Like
3578

Roe v Wade killed over 60 million babiesā€¦ One of them may have cured cancer.

3579

You should be. The center for reproductive rights is using this woman as a pawn to further political agendas. They could have just as easily gotten her a bus ticket to New Mexico.

3 Likes
3580

This is Texas, itā€™s illegal for someone (an individual or an organization) to assist a woman to leave the state for an abortion.

WW

1 Like
3581

Or become the next Hitlerā€¦

3582

Who would know? People travel from Texas to New Mexico every day ā€¦ lots of them.

1 Like
3583

Yeah. Why take the chance. Kill 'em all.

1 Like