:grinning: Please continue battling your strawman. It is quite entertaining.

Doesn’t matter what he’ll do, y’all will bitch and complain about it.

Says the guy that supports green new deal…

I’ll give you props for creative effort but I’ll have to disagree with the suggestion the Prez (alone) is a ā€œsuper spreaderā€.
Since the WH will not agree to or share contact spread info it’s really unsure how he was exposed although the young lady on his staff seems to be the obvious culprit (IMHO) and she likely exposed the First Lady. Some tested positive for Covid and exhibited no symptoms unlike the President! But by the Grace of God all seem to be recovering.

That alone at best is neglect.

1 Like

What happens if/when Biden gets COVID?

Trump said ā€œDon’t let the virus dominate youā€ when he tested positive. What would Biden’s response be?

1 Like

Actually that alone may not be complete. I work as a school bus driver. Now that students in our school district are remotely learning, we transport school lunches along wit food service personnel from school kitchens to distribution points in the community.
Two school kitchens, all of those employees and four drivers from our lot have had to be shut down and the drivers quarantine for a minimum of 14 days and clear testing before returning to work. The school kitchens and the busses have to be decontaminated by the county environment teams.
I don’t know who any of the food service employees are. I suspect who the drivers are, they haven’t been to the bus lot. The only reason we know of the situation is by mandate they have to inform us and that’s probably because of liability ramifications.
How did all these people become infected? Could have been anyone from any family. Contact tracing, good luck!

The CDC disagrees with your assessment. They feel contact tracing should have been attempted. But thanks for your story. Hope everyone is feeling better

He has?

Biden did not demand a virtual debate.

It will automatically be Trump’s fault. No need to see test results and no such thing as superdpreader any more.

Of course they have to contact trace. What I was inferring is that I’m not sure it is 100% thorough! Not to mention there are people walking around with the virus displaying no symptoms and unless tested how would they know?
Case in point, some of the WH staff testing positive/ no symptoms and these people unlike maybe you and me, are tested regularly because of their high profile jobs.
What a quandary.

Nothing is ever 100%. But science and data shows the contact tracing helps.

Exactly, and like everything ā€˜Ol Joe engages in, someone else makes that decision for him.
But to be fair, the Debate Committee made that call and didn’t consult either campaign prior to making the announcement. Well we are being told that anyway. Considering the makeup of the committee, it’s easy to be skeptical?

Except it’s not a lie since we now have more effective treatment for covid then we have for the flu, close to a cure as evidenced by President Trumps quick recovery with vaccine development faster then we’ve ever seen and there are cases like his all across the county that the media does not report.

The ā€œscienceā€ is proving it everyday with factual statistics at cdc.gov. We need less TDS and more research and reliable sources where we get our information.

1 Like

Look at this way, treating it like the prevention of STD’s

To completely mitigate risk, you quarantine, which = abstinence. In this case you’re choosing abstinence, unlike the Proud Boys and their ilk where abstinence has chosen them. 100% effective

Then there the social distancing and mask approach, kind of like sex with condoms. Yeah it’s an inconvenience and isn’t quite as fun but hey, you are still living your life with minimal interruptions and greatly reduced risk of transmission or contraction.

And then there are the anti maskers and Trump, who are the equivalent of truck stop hookers not using any protection with any rando that has a pack of smokes or will buy them a chili dog.

That’s where we are.

5 Likes

ā€œBut there’s no point in using condoms, they aren’t 100% effective against STDs or pregnancy! Silly libs.ā€

1 Like

FReeDooooMm!

But they’re, uh, not.

And you’re uh, positive of uh, this because?