She needs to be told to get over herself and take a hike!

2 Likes

Did Ginsberg recuse herself from abortion cases for attending and supporting pro abortion conventions or from cases involving Trump’s EOs for threatening to leave to New Zealand if Trump were elected?

1 Like

If one goes by Court precedence, recusal for alleged first-hand conflict of interest by a Justice, let alone secondary actions or interest of a family member, has not been the norm.

This affair can appropriately be filed under nothing burgers.

2 Likes

The Democrat virulence on this shows how desperate they are to secure the Supreme Court for the Libs before they spend the next 40 years wandering in the political wilderness, a tiny flock of sheep led by butt-head goats.

1 Like

Okay I’ll bite. List the pro abortion conventions that RBG attended.

I’m not familiar enough with recusal precedent, frankly. I just think it would be the prudent thing to do, regardless of the norm.

A very quick (30 seconds max) and cursory Google search yielded this:

I am certain that greater effort would find much more precident.

1 Like

I still don’t think she is threat but maybe helps understand the personalities involved in conspiracy theory mongering

Discussion: which is a greater threat to the Supreme Court?

  1. Ginni
  2. Assassins
1 Like

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor spoke highly of colleague Justice Clarence Thomas during an event on Thursday, saying, “He is a man who cares deeply about the court as an institution.”

“Justice Thomas is the one justice in the building that literally knows every employee’s name, every one of them. And not only does he know their names, he remembers their families’ names and histories,” she said.

1 Like