They forgot to add the key phrase, “while supporting Trump” in the statute, but the DOJ believes it is implied.
We have massive evidence of Hunter Biden selling influence to foreign governments, and the DOJ has been slow walking any investigation. Meanwhile they prosecute the Democrats political opponents.
Welcome to Putin’s Russia where anti-corruption laws only apply to political opponents of the regime.
Not that I agree, but misapplication of a law does not render that law unconstitutional. It’s a good law.
Bill.in.PA:
They forgot to add the key phrase, “while supporting Trump” in the statute, but the DOJ believes it is implied.
We have massive evidence of Hunter Biden selling influence to foreign governments, and the DOJ has been slow walking any investigation. Meanwhile they prosecute the Democrats political opponents.
Welcome to Putin’s Russia where anti-corruption laws only apply to political opponents of the regime.
why was the Trump DOJ looking into him?
Jezcoe
July 25, 2021, 11:36pm
25
Well this is certainly a novel take.
He’s a crook’s crook.
I thought the republicans were for law and order.
Guess it doesn’t apply to their own. As barrack gets a pass.
Allan
since when does lobbying have to be successful? even if he had no effect (which he did), its still lobbying
is it? lobbying is nothing more than petitioning the government. isn’t that a right? i do believe foreign interests should be disclosed, the question however is valid. and isn’t kind of obvious when someone is lobbying for a foreign government anyway?
Bill.in.PA:
They forgot to add the key phrase, “while supporting Trump” in the statute, but the DOJ believes it is implied.
We have massive evidence of Hunter Biden selling influence to foreign governments, and the DOJ has been slow walking any investigation. Meanwhile they prosecute the Democrats political opponents.
Welcome to Putin’s Russia where anti-corruption laws only apply to political opponents of the regime.
So since DoJs under republican administrations don’t prosecute innocent people then Hillary has been innocent all along?
false, prior to mueller’s abuse of it, it had been used 4 times since 2007.
JayJay
July 26, 2021, 12:23pm
33
Conservative crooks are always set up by the Libs.
They’re never just crooked on their own.
JayJay
July 26, 2021, 12:24pm
34
Once again…provide evidence Hunter Biden was influencing US policy, either successfully or unsuccessfully.
He was trying to capitalize on his dad’s name, which is gross but not illegal.
You know…like what Ivanka and Jared and Donald Junior did WHILE HOLDING POSITIONS in Trump’s White House?
completely false. hunter biden sought and was granted meetings with state department officials while joe was vp and he was on burisma’s board.
otherwise, the tds is noted
STODR
July 26, 2021, 12:28pm
36
They conviently forgot about Kerry and Iran.
This is not a FARA violation.
Burisma is not a foriegn government.
You’re confusing FARA with the Logan Act.
The Logan Act is the one that’s not enforced.
fara was used 4 times since 2007 until mueller’s abuse of it
And?
The Logan Act has been used twice (both times unsuccessfully) in more than 200 years.