Why that is not the point, the point is the level of intell in the data being handled, it may not have been marked yet, but that does not mean its OK to blab all over the place and miss handle the info.
“blab all over the place?” Where did you get that from? Also, without understanding how info is classified, you can’t have a very informed conversation about this issue.
And they will use government force to punish you if you don’t think and act like them.
JWK
“Liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, [but] it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view,” William F. Buckley
No rights are violated at all. Nobody is denying him the right to run for office. Are you denying people the right to out his racism? Would you deny people their first amendment rights to speak up?
the problem is not that people publicize the facts. That’s a good thing. The problem is the characterization of him now as a public servant who would support racist policy.
lol - “blab all over the place and miss handle the info”
You’re just more than happy to keep making up ■■■■ as you go along. And it’s pathetic.
How many more ■■■■■■■ years do you want your ■■■■■■ up party to investigate this stupid ■■■■ for you, while you sit around and not give one little ■■■■ about Donald Trump sharing Top Secret info from one of our allies (Israel) directly with Russians in the oval office?
New York Times, May 13, 2016: Data released Friday by the Major Cities Chiefs Police Association, based on reports from more than 60 cities, showed notable increases in murders in about two dozen cities in the first three months of the year compared to last year and a 9 percent increase nationwide. But nearly 40 cities showed a decline or remained essentially flat