Samm
957
Sorry … We have been at this Idaho law thing so long I forgot that it wasn’t the OP.
Score one for the turtle. 
1 Like
Ah, I see what you are getting at. Tragically, it is nonsense. It is simply proof that the treatment failed.
Have you ever had a headache, took some aspirin, yet the headache remained? Is this proof that Bayer are villains? Of course not.
Now having said that, I will acknowledge that there is a surfeit of snake oil out there. This is why we have organizations such as the AMA who review and study these claims, and issue recommendations.
And interestingly, the AMA has determined that gender dysphoria is real.
Samm
959
Nope. Not in the least. My opinion is based solely on facts and logic. I could not care less about shrinks bilking their delusional patients. I only feel sorry for the kids who will be scared for life if and when they come to the realization that their dysphoria was all in their heads.
BTY You still haven’t backed up that “majority of doctors” thing. Are you going to do that ir should we just let it go?
While I don’t necessarily agree with the substance of this post, I can certainly understand the sentiment.
This is why you can’t just walk into a doctor’s office and begin gender reassignment. There is a lengthy process of examination and evaluation before it begins.
“Proof”? “Villains”?
Why do you insist on misrepresenting my statements in a dishonestly extreme paraphrase?
Is it because you can’t argue against my actual position?
You cracked the code! As a non-doctor!
I am arguing against your position, you just seem unable to comprehend.
[quote=“Supreme_War_Pig, post:963, topic:241521, full:true”]
No. You are creating straw men and pretending they are my argument.
Okay, let’s go back to the beginning. The initial post I responded to was (in part) this:
You are implying that while doctors and medical organizations may agree that gender dysphoria is real, and gender reassignment is an appropriate treatment, they can’t be trusted, and in fact may be doing this because ‘there is a good living to be made’.
The point that I have repeatedly tried to make is that getting paid for providing health care is NOT evidence of ulterior motives.
You then spun off into this nonsense that if a treatment fails a refund is required. I engaged you on it because I am a good natured fellow. But frankly, this position is ridiculous, and even more importantly, irrelevant to the discussion.
So, let me restate in terms even you might understand: getting paid for providing health care is not evidence of perfidy.
Samm
969
Well, it was pretty darned simple. 

Striker840:

Supreme_War_Pig:
See above
I read above, so??
If you can’t discern the answer to your question, I can’t help you.
Can’t they simply get the counseling they need explaining how gender is a social construct and not a real thing?
Guvnah
972
Lib parents and teachers nudging kids into confusion with woke “compassion” manufactures dysphoria.
1 Like
e7alr
974
Are points of view of what constitutes a social construct a philosophical opinion or a medical fact?
What is the definition of the word “affirm.?”
Does surgically changing the appearance of a body, from it’s natural form, affirm or deceive?
Does artificially altering the development of a body, through the application of unnatural levels of hormones, and chemical inhibitors, for the purpose of altering outward appearance, affirm or deceive?
1 Like
Getting paid is a potential motive for prescribing a treatment. I never said it proves the motive is purely pecuniary. It is certainly foolish to assume that because a person is a qualified doctor they must have the best interests of the patient in mind above their own financial gain.
I do think that salesmen who do not stand behind their medical products are pushing onto desperate people a product they don’t really believe in. Their reason for doing that is usually their own financial gain.

Paul_Thomson:
Getting paid is a potential motive for prescribing a treatment. I never said it proves the motive is purely pecuniary. It is certainly foolish to assume that because a person is a qualified doctor they must have the best interests of the patient in mind above their own financial gain.
I do think that salesmen who do not stand behind their medical products are pushing onto desperate people a product they don’t really believe in. Their reason for doing that is usually their own financial gain.
Okay, we’ll leave it there.