Definitely could be above board. Mueller and his team are tracing the web of financial transactions that resulted in President Trump, and I am not going to be surprised by a very negative outcome for Trump.
The news outlet noted that the transactions were discovered after law enforcement officials told financial institutions to sift through records of people connected to the Russia probe.
Does it not bother anyone else here that four investigators would be illegally leaking partial information on an ongoing investigation, for political purposes, when there is no conclusion that there was either a connection to the Tower meeting or that the money ever went to some nefarious purpose?
All this basically shows that the deep state is not dead.
One of the reasons this investigation is taking so long is because crooks don’t write a check and put “For money laundering” on the Memo line.
That and the fact that it involves people and banks in a dozen nations or more.
Money laundering has been made a primary component since the beginning
I think that’s the part that scares them the most so they pretend it’s not there.
And when there is a sitting president potentially implicated, it is EXTREMELY important that they get it right. These are not the amateurs or political hacks some Trump sycophants try to make them out to be.
What kind of insurance is that?
You mean like accusing B. Clinton of rape?
Btw, Trump is holding a fundraiser at one of his hotels this very minute. You guys can donate.
There are also websites to donate for hurricane relief.
Yep. Definitely panicky.
Since the Dems were never going to get 67 Senate seats, how, exactly, was impeaching Trump “insurance”?
She orchestrated th err umm tower meeting promising trump JR dirt on her? Clever.
Is he on the forum?
She’s brilliant… isn’t she.
It’s called a “honey pot”.
Still waiting for the answer as to how impeachment was an “insurance policy” when the Dems were never getting 67 Senate seats.
Not surprised all I’ve got from @Call_me_Ishmael is crickets on that so far.
or that impeaching trump and putting pence in the oval office was some sort of win for clinton…
From the article:
"A suspicious activity report does not mean there is any evidence of criminal activity. But BuzzFeed notes that federal prosecutors have used those reports to charge people such as Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort.
Manafort was convicted in August for several charges related to bank and tax fraud. Prosecutors have not charged the Agalarovs, Goldstone and Kaveladze."
So Manafort moved money around to avoid taxes. Other people (especially billionaires) move money around for many other purposes.
Hmmmm…and none of this money was transferred until after Trump began running for President. There’s your collusion right there. Yet one more conspiracy.
From the article:
A suspicious activity report does not mean there is any evidence of criminal activity
I believe there is a whole bunch of wishing and hoping going on here.
