Children are going to be indoctrinated.
Whose purview is it?
In what?
Children are going to be indoctrinated.
Whose purview is it?
In what?
define indoctrination.
because to some bible study is indoctrination.
Parents…
that is were the issue arise.
parent have full control over their children lives unless those choices happen to be “harmful”.
Republican claim allowing transgender medical choices is child abuse.
and Democrat claim allowing un vaccinated s a public health issue.
which would allow the state to override the parental choice.
define indoctrination.
because to some bible study is indoctrination.
I agree. We should start here.
Is indoctrination a bad word? Should be defined
define indoctrination.
because to some bible study is indoctrination.
in church? at home?
or by govt employees?
CanadianJudo:define indoctrination.
because to some bible study is indoctrination.
in church? at home?
or by govt employees?
some people view churches as a type of indoctrination.
some people view churches as a type of indoctrination.
fascinating
govt employees?
CanadianJudo:some people view churches as a type of indoctrination.
fascinating
govt employees?
some people view school as indoctrination.
didnt think you would dare answer
didnt think you would dare answer
well if I was a religious fundamentalist that view woman as subservient to their husband I wouldn’t want a school teaching them about woman suffrage.
mind you at that point I just wouldn’t let me children go to school like Amish.
Probably a ranking is in order
(1) parents - this should not be changed.
(2) parental choice as to who gets to influence their children
(3) some portion of society - government employees, religious figures, etc because the children shouldn’t be isolated to the point where they have no interaction with societal factors
Probably a ranking is in order
(1) parents - this should not be changed.
(2) parental choice as to who gets to influence their children
(3) some portion of society - government employees, religious figures, etc because the children shouldn’t be isolated to the point where they have no interaction with societal factors
which is pretty much how it work,
but issue arise when the government feel the parent are being harmful to the well being of the child.
thinkingman:didnt think you would dare answer
well if I was a religious fundamentalist that view woman as subservient to their husband I wouldn’t want a school teaching them about woman suffrage.
mind you at that point I just wouldn’t let me children go to school like Amish.
so might as well teach them about tranny weirdos huh?
The definition of harm is too subjective and is therefore problematic imo
CanadianJudo: thinkingman:didnt think you would dare answer
well if I was a religious fundamentalist that view woman as subservient to their husband I wouldn’t want a school teaching them about woman suffrage.
mind you at that point I just wouldn’t let me children go to school like Amish.
so might as well teach them about tranny weirdos huh?
Transgender people exist, and should be treated with respect like everyone else.
if you issue basic morality being taught in school, don’t send your children to a public school.
The definition of harm is too subjective and is therefore problematic imo
Pretty much anyone who has ever worked in CPS would strongly disagree, takes a awful lot of harm for the government to care.
Against my better judgment.
Some what?
WuWei:Whose purview is it?
Parents…
I like that answer.
FreeAndClear:The definition of harm is too subjective and is therefore problematic imo
Pretty much anyone who has ever worked in CPS would strongly disagree, takes a awful lot of harm for the government to care.
Of course because they are trained to note physical and emotional abuse. There are other types of “harms” that come into play that government is trying to define.