If you are going to not take more seriously, I am going to point out the fallacies in your thinking. My preference would be for you to engage seriously but as that would require you deal with evidence or data, I am sure you will decline to do so. Unsupported mockery is comforting, I suppose.
A political calculation, to be sure. It is Schiffās position that getting a decision through the courts could take months, even years. That the issues would be lost in voters minds in the meantime, and then the election is upon us.
Also, they felt that they had enough evidence to move now.
And, the fact that Trump has stonewalled perfectly good House subpoenaās provided a further article of impeachment.
Well yeah, thatās been it for 3 years. This latest rush to get in before election season is rather sloppy though. Nancy tried to stop them, but they were just to eager.
Actually no. The end of it is the trial by the Senate.
By impeaching for not complying with Subpoenas before the Constitutional issues of the authority of Congress and separation of powers without a decision through the court system, Congress is taking the Constitutional authority of two of the branches of government upon itself.
Well they can go through the courts if they think the president has been wronged, but impeachment is up to the house. He wonāt go to jail for being impeached just removed with the senateās trial.
Should he go to jail? I donāt this there is beyond reasonable doubt, so no.