Impeaching scotus judges

Yeah, I don’t think this is even worth speculating over, even out of partisan curiosity.

Hell no!
Trump has shown the weakness of executive orders. They are a monarchical device for the president to bypass Congress and legislate by fiat.
If there are the votes to impeach Trump judges, then there are votes for congress to pass laws that can’t be overturned by the next president’s pen.

What’s their impeachable offenses? Really why would that even be a question.

1 Like

It can be simple as partisan…or activism

Really… “We all”? I’d say there are more then 63 MILLION voters (and growing in numbers) that “know” the only thing Trump did was…WIN!!

6 Likes

Only to lie to your face for the last 18 months! Congrats!

Yeah, if Obama had nominated someone, the will of the people would have been completed since he was duly elected twice to be president, but since Obama didn’t even bother to nominate anyone like Merick Garland, what are the Republicans to do?

1 Like

He has very good very successful policies. When I think of lying i think, of course, of his critics.

No. I am not being serious. I think the 9 is good, 7 would likely be better, like you say, but more than 9 would definitely be moving in the wrong direction.

Frankly, I am not as worried about a left leaning or right leaning SC as much as I am concerned with having “a” best and brightest from the vast field of candidates.

Policies can be debated. I am not talking about policy. Trump is a liar and cons are proud of it so long as Trump puts a few extra dollars in their pocket while driving up the deficit

1 Like

Modern day Judas wannabes selling the Soul of America for a CostCo membership.

And then they spend the next year saying, “Damn, now I have to shop at Costco.”

I’ve got to say I’d be opposed to this, unless there is some sort of crime a justice is involved with that I don’t know about. I’m not aware of any crimes any of them are accused of committing.

“But to my complete shock, he groped me while I was setting the table, suggesting I should sit ‘right next to him,’” she said. “When I feebly explained that I’d been assigned to the other table, he groped again…’are you sure??’ I said I was and proceeded to keep my distance.”

In her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Hill accused Thomas of continually discussing his porn predilection, which included talk of bestiality and rape scenes as well as an actor who went by the name Long Dong Silver.

Actually, that would be the so-called “progressives” who were opposed to what this country was founded to be from their beginning and they did it for a fistful of programs and being generous with their votes.

A more likely scenario is the Dems getting control of the Senate, then the Presidency, then packing the Court.

:laughing:[quote=“Rurudyne, post:35, topic:8354, full:true”]

Actually, that would be the so-called “progressives” who were opposed to what this country was founded to be from their beginning and they did it for a fistful of programs and being generous with their votes.
[/quote]

:laughing:

Even when they don’t get a few extra dollars put in their pockets.

Because these policies tend to sap the real wealth of “the forgotten”.

But that’s OK because then modern conservatives give them a bunch of boogeymen…Mexicans, Chinese, socialists…to blame for their woes.

Laugh all you want, but the regressive progressives were all about Arbitrary government and hauling us away from the genius of our founding from their beginnings. Modern progressives are only worse than the early and they will only get worse.

:laughing: