Igor Danchenko arrested, charged with lying to FBI about information in Steele dossier

What was the lie that he told?

When you see what the lie is… you can see why the FBI didn’t care to follow something up.

Because it is a very specific and trivial thing that he lied about according to the charge.

I don’t care about those charges…I care how FBI and CoJ acted without verifying Danchanko story.

I noticed you didn’t answer my question.

Does that concern you?

2 Likes

Why don’t you care about those charges? That is the crux of the story of him lying to the FBI.

Durham is charging him with saying two lies… neither of those things have to do with Carter Page btw…

When we look at what Durham is saying are material lies… you can kind of see why in 2017 no one cared.

Stop deflecting…FBI knowing taken out FISA warrants in unsubstantiated material, Did you read the indictment?

Does that concern you or are you not going to answer my question.

1 Like

Nope. :orange_book: :wink:

2 Likes

IMO this indictment reflects badly on FBI…real bad.

1 Like

The FBI reflect badly on the FBI. :rofl:

2 Likes

Amen.

I wonder what those pushing for socialism think they would get out of it?

Not much history students are they? Equally poor and eating out of trash cans like in Venezuela?

Millions killed like in China and Russia?

I guess they think it would be DIFFERENT this rime. :roll_eyes:

2 Likes

I did read the indictment.

It has nothing to do with the initial warrant or the first renewal.

How hard is it to talk about what the lies are in the indictment?

Let us go with the one in count one.

Durham says that Danchenko said that he did not talk any specifics with Dolan when he did… okay… that could be a lie.

But what was the information that he got from Dolan?

If Obama can eat dog, they can too. :wink:

3 Likes

I have read that many of those pushing socialism/communism think they just haven’t had the right people running it yet.

That takes a specially kind of stupid imo.

1 Like

The new evidence continues to mount that the Clinton-funded Steele Dossier used fabricated information from Igor Danchenko and Charles Dolan Jr. (aka PR Executive-1). The dossier was then used as the basis for launching the FBI probe that resulted in the $32 million Mueller investigation. The indictments include charges that Dunchenko lied to FBI investigators about the source of the information:

Durham told the court: “According to Organizer-1, during the aforementioned tour of the Presidential Suite, a Moscow Hotel staff member told the participants, including PR Executive-1, that Trump had stayed in the Presidential Suite. According to both Organizer-1 and PR Executive-1, the staff member did not mention any sexual or salacious activity.”

The entire story of the prostitutes was therefore a fabrication — and Danchenko is now being charged for lying to the FBI about whether Dolan was a source for “Trump’s stay and alleged activity in the Moscow hotel.”

Earlier revelations showed that the FBI used an information laundering operation to fabricate justifications for the massive surveillance operations. The approach was to leak false information to complicit media and then use the media reports as sources used to justify the FISA warrants:

FBI Director James Comey admits to leaking his ‘memos’ to the New York Times. FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe was busted for leaking and lying about it. FBI #2 Counterintelligence Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Attorney Lisa Page are caught in their text messages leaking to Politico, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post.
…. AND the FBI is caught, in at least one FISA application, using Yahoo media reports provided by them AND their investigative source Christopher Steele to establish a basis for FISA “Title I” surveillance; the most intrusive and wide-open search and surveillance authority possible.

Should the Clinton campaign be responsible for reimbursing government for the cost of the Mueller investigation?

Can those wrongfully targeted for investigations and media smear campaigns be compensated under defamation laws?

2 Likes

Okay… the indictment isn’t that long of a read… but here… let us go ahead and bring this up.

I know you guys are salivating over this… it isn’t going to go anywhere.

Meanwhile, in the Orange Pain Chamber. lol

tenor1

1 Like

Not with democrats in charge it isn’t

1 Like

and the other thing that should show you that Dolan is probably not in any legal danger.

So Danchenko contacts him about why Manafort got fired and he said that he had a friend in the GOP who had some dirt and then he simply shared what was in public reporting.

That is the extent of Dolan’s lie.

Talking smack about Manafort is not a crime.

Magicked away an awful lot of meetings with Russian operatives here.

Yes… Manafort did meet with Russian operatives.

Crazy I know.

No time to unpack all this now sorry, going away for the weekend, maybe later, but suffice it to say you are concentrating on what they could charge and ignoring the timeline and who met who.

2 Likes

Still deflecting after telling us we didn’t read indictment…and YOU still haven’t answered my question.

Fact remain…FBI taken out a FISA warrant on collaborated questionable source doesn’t look good for FBI and it’s all in this indictment.

Now the real question is is what Durham is going to do about it.

Now I’m done with you unless you want to answer my simple question. Tire of your games.

2 Likes