It’s not a great look when intelligence is politicized by a very narrow group of people, and intelligence agencies like the CIA and FBI, which are supposed to be independent, are not independent. They have a revolving door. They don’t play by the same rules as other agencies, they don’t respect the Constitution, but they play by the rules of the Washington insider elite.
And the CIA is part of that elite, they do everything for Washington. Because they are part of it, the CIA does everything for Washington, they are supposed to have integrity.
And they are not, according to the CIA they lie constantly about everything and everything they were involved in, they lied about the CIA torturing people, because they made a deal with Obama.
And it will read the same thing. Even they didn’t follow normal protocol nothing reaches to level of criminality or abuse.
As I said. You had the IG write 435 pages of bias within the FBI…bias didn’t effect any of their decisions.
Just like Hillary emails…they reword it grossly negligent to extremely careless. One a criminal charge while other one isn’t.
FBI can reword anything they want, write their report in ways to clear individuals or to imprison em for life.
That’s what makes them so dangerous…because they are the law. They will use terminology to clear or convict at will.
And thus make them the must corruptible law enforcement in America…and no one can challenge em.
The public must not know how easy it is to abuse the FISA system…because that can be used against everyone that was convicted using the FISA system to gather evidence.
Thank you. It’s hard but someone has to do it. We must continue that work.
This is why we are working so hard to end sexualized violence. To end sexualization of women and girls globally, and to end all forms of violence and discrimination against women and girls worldwide.
And also with you. It is the work that matters most, and as long as enjoyment is derived, then peace shall eternally follow. Righteous causes dictate righteous outcomes my friend.
No, the “not technically illegal” defense is employed when some yahoo claims a law was broken when it wasn’t. That says nothing about whether or not it is something that should be accepted or condoned.