No, you are simply rejecting that which you don’t wish to accept because of your own political bias.
We’ve been talking for days about how we both agree that the leaks were coming out of New York.
Are you that incapable of reading what I wrote?
Why should I accept something without it being proven?
You ask for proof of assertions all the time. Why do you get so fussy when others do the same to you?
He was forced to come out because of bias law enforcement. At least, that’s what you told me earlier.
I thought you were opposed to bias law enforcement? Or is that just if they’re biased against your guy?
Their source says this about the list:
I started collecting ‘spook words’ this after reading about a rumor that the major intelligence agencies would scan all messages floating around on the Internet looking for something interesting
You should really read your links. You’re reduced to repeating internet rumors
from 1998.
The fear is palpable among the Trumpists that the IG report is going to be a bust like Nunes Memo.
I get what you wrote. You think they had it in for Hillary.
Thus the leaks.
That’s naive.
DC was sitting on that information for a month and never said anything.
So I’m sure some in NY division where upset that they were paying attention to those new emails.
1 Like
You’re not to smart are you?
MaCabe sat on that information for almost a month…and FBI in DC don’e nothing with it until the leaks started coming out.
Why was Comey and McCabe ignoring those emails?
They were hoping to put it off until after Nov election until NY division forced their hands.
You know it.
2 Likes
Yes, these are FISA Section 702 Warrantless meta-data collections.
–Konrad
I know. You’re okay with the NY FBI corruptly using their power to sway an election to beat Clinton. You don’t have to tell me anymore.
An education, free of charge.
By Oct. 3, senior officials at the FBI — including Comey — had been alerted that the Weiner laptop contained an unknown number of Clinton emails. By this point, the email controversy had receded as an issue in the presidential race. Any news of the discovery would surely have profound consequences for the Clinton campaign, especially as the election drew ever closer. Yet, over the following three weeks, FBI agents proceeded unhurriedly with their investigation, on the premise that what they knew of the discovery was not, as one official put it to me, “investigatively significant.”
Class dismissed.
The biased pro-Trump FBI agents in NY were looking for anything to get at Clinton. The emails found on the laptop were nothing new. Nothing urgent.
What the hell is wrong with you? You can admit how corrupt Obama administration was can you?
DC wasn’t responding to New York division about those emails on Weenier’s laptop.
And you have no problem with that?
Oh yeah…you though they should protect Clinton. That’s their job fight? Protect Obama administration and Hillary at all cost.
This is why I don’t always respond to your BS…but I understand you want some attention from me.
I think you have reading comprehensive problem.
I assume he got it from UK court documents.
According the the British filing, “The dossier was supplied to Fusion on terms that it was subject to an obligation not to disclose it or any of it to third parties without the agreement of Orbis and/or Mr. Steele.”
However, Simpson specifically tasked Steele with spreading the dossier’s contents to at least five U.S. media outlets friendly to Clinton, via both in-person meetings and Skype. While in Rome, Steele also briefed the FBI, who reportedly offered him $50,000 to verify parts of the dossier. However, the FBI has denied making any payments or reimbursements to Steele.
1 Like
Willful ignorance.
My spelling…yeah it is. Damn can’t edit. 
Can we finally agree that Section 702 FISA, Title 1 FISA and Wiretap act surveillance are completely different?
Can we also agree that Carter Page was under a Title 1 FISA warrant, not under Section 702 or Wiretap act?
Next …
What this means in practice is that, under a single warrant, anyone Page had a text or phone call with in the Trump campaign during the brief months of his association with it in 2016, was fair game, as a direct connection, all the way through the end of the last warrant-extension period on Page in October 2017. The second-hop connections of those initial contacts—meaning everyone that those people had contact with—are also fair game. In other words, it’s likely that almost everyone on the Trump campaign staff was included in the universe of first- and second-order contacts of Carter Page.
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/256333/fisas-license-to-hop
Why is this important? It really means that a FISA warrant on “low-level” campaign worker like Carter Page can yield information on the entire Trump campaign.
What damage was caused? It depends on what was done with all of that information. If it was used as tactical intelligence on the campaign, quite a lot.
Why is this important? Even if the FBI did not pass the tactical intelligence on to the DNC, if allowed, this becomes a precedent that we really don’t want in this country. Imagine that the Trump administration uses the FBI and the DOJ against the Democrats next time. Time to think about it is now.
–Konrad
You’ve made it abundantly clear, you’re okay with corruption and bias as long as it helps your guy.
Why were the NY FBI so desperate to crack into the emails? To hurt Clinton. They knew the emails weren’t significant.
If page emailed or called Reince Priebus then everyone that Priebus came into contact was fair game.
1 Like
