If Trump is Convicted in the Senate: President #46, #47 in 2021?

Snagglepuss · 2019-10-31T17:20:10.989Z

Paul_Thomson:

thinkingman:

the senate vote will demonstrate what a desperate political ploy this all was

That depends. Mueller’s team and the remnants of the Insurance Policy Squad imbedded in the CIA, FBI and DOJ have had three years to research the dirty laundry of every Senator and their loved ones in order to blackmail enough senators to sacrifice their political careers to preserve their and their loved one’s reputations and safety. The swamp is panicking to re-bury the skeltons Trump’s term has thus far unearthed. They are desperate and will stop at nothing.

I can’t this post enough! Thanks Paul!

thinkingman · 2019-10-31T17:40:52.548Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

the senate vote will demonstrate what a desperate political ploy this all was

I wouldn’t count those chickens just yet.

unless they find an actual crime, sure

There doesn’t have to be a “crime” for impeachment to be valid.

you’re confusing the babified ■■■■ show in the idiot majority house with what the senate will decide

#AOC

Jezcoe · 2019-10-31T17:42:59.988Z

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

the senate vote will demonstrate what a desperate political ploy this all was

I wouldn’t count those chickens just yet.

unless they find an actual crime, sure

There doesn’t have to be a “crime” for impeachment to be valid.

you’re confusing the babified ■■■■ show in the idiot majority house with what the senate will decide

#AOC

I recognize all of those words but they don’t make any sense when out into that order.

The President doesn’t have to commit a defined “crime” in order to be impeached and then removed from office by the Senate.

thinkingman · 2019-10-31T17:43:47.165Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

the senate vote will demonstrate what a desperate political ploy this all was

I wouldn’t count those chickens just yet.

unless they find an actual crime, sure

There doesn’t have to be a “crime” for impeachment to be valid.

you’re confusing the babified ■■■■ show in the idiot majority house with what the senate will decide

#AOC

I recognize all of those words but they don’t make any sense when out into that order.

The President doesn’t have to commit a defined “crime” in order to be impeached and removed from office by the Senate.

article II, section 4

any questions?

maybe the order of those words will make sense

Jezcoe · 2019-10-31T17:46:39.532Z

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

the senate vote will demonstrate what a desperate political ploy this all was

I wouldn’t count those chickens just yet.

unless they find an actual crime, sure

There doesn’t have to be a “crime” for impeachment to be valid.

you’re confusing the babified ■■■■ show in the idiot majority house with what the senate will decide

#AOC

I recognize all of those words but they don’t make any sense when out into that order.

The President doesn’t have to commit a defined “crime” in order to be impeached and removed from office by the Senate.

article II, section 4

any questions?

maybe the order of those words will make sense

Let’s have a hypothetical.

Say upon inauguration a President flies to Tahiti and refuses to come back to the country and do the job of Presidenting.

The House would be fully within the rights to impeach and the Senate would be wise to remove that person from office even though there was no law that was broken.

There was no “crime” committed

SimplyTrying · 2019-10-31T18:13:04.850Z

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

the senate vote will demonstrate what a desperate political ploy this all was

I wouldn’t count those chickens just yet.

unless they find an actual crime, sure

Don’t need one.

for senate to convict, umm yes you do

You’re probably right. I’m thinking of the House.

SimplyTrying · 2019-10-31T18:13:55.229Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

the senate vote will demonstrate what a desperate political ploy this all was

I wouldn’t count those chickens just yet.

unless they find an actual crime, sure

Don’t need one.

for senate to convict, umm yes you do

No.

No they don’t.

Ha HA. I just relented and said he was probably right. Thanks for correcting us.

hwyflier · 2019-10-31T18:29:40.640Z

The whole reason we have a Vice President Pence was for this scenario. Trump collapses in on himself and an Evangelical savior can ascend to the presidency through the grace of God.

This is the whole point of Pence’s existence. He’s got to start moving, in the name of the Lord, now.

BillBrown · 2019-10-31T18:43:45.068Z

fallenturtle:

If the PUSA is removed from office It should be against the law for their VP taking their place to pardon them.

No problem. Just amend the constitution- should be easy. You just need 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of the states to go along with it.

Vigilante · 2019-10-31T18:45:17.358Z

A Plan B if you will.

“If anyone thinks a partisan impeachment process would constrain President Trump, they are fooling themselves,” Peterson said in a statement last month. “Without significant bipartisan support, impeachment proceedings will be a lengthy and divisive action with no resolution.”

thinkingman · 2019-10-31T19:17:09.273Z

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

Jezcoe:

thinkingman:

SimplyTrying:

thinkingman:

the senate vote will demonstrate what a desperate political ploy this all was

I wouldn’t count those chickens just yet.

unless they find an actual crime, sure

There doesn’t have to be a “crime” for impeachment to be valid.

you’re confusing the babified ■■■■ show in the idiot majority house with what the senate will decide

#AOC

I recognize all of those words but they don’t make any sense when out into that order.

The President doesn’t have to commit a defined “crime” in order to be impeached and removed from office by the Senate.

article II, section 4

any questions?

maybe the order of those words will make sense

Let’s have a hypothetical.

Say upon inauguration a President flies to Tahiti and refuses to come back to the country and do the job of Presidenting.

The House would be fully within the rights to impeach and the Senate would be wise to remove that person from office even though there was no law that was broken.

There was no “crime” committed

but an impeachable offense has. this falls under “high crimes and misdemeanors” as dereliction of duty

which is in article II etc…

oh dont worry msnbc will convince you something he did applies. nancy and liar schiff are depending on it

bigtwnvin · 2019-10-31T19:34:01.110Z

Why not?

Chris · 2019-10-31T20:01:02.593Z

bigtwnvin:

Why not?

A Republican hasn’t won in a landslide in a Presidential election since 1988.

NJBob · 2019-10-31T22:06:47.688Z

Weedhopper:

No.

The criminal investigation into Obama’s Deepstate traitors, attempted coups have consequences!

Remember that when these sickos are rounded up.

JW needs more money. Trump supporters should give until it hurts.

bigtwnvin · 2019-10-31T22:17:16.583Z

Oh a “landslide”, got it.

zantax · 2019-10-31T22:51:14.885Z

NJBob:

Axxowiz:

There not going to put their careers in jeopardy just like the Democratic senators didn’t with Bill Clinton. It’s all politics and they want to keep their jobs, but I assume they will lose 2-3 republican votes in the vote and then gain 2-3 democratic senate votes from the senators in West Virginia, Alabama, and possibly Montana.

The other possibility, although a long shot, is the Reps will see this as their best opportunity to be rid of Trump once and for all.

I’m sure 80% of them wish he would just go away.

I agree they would love to give him the boot, but for that to happen, Republican voters would have to abandon Trump and I see no evidence that is even remotely happening.

FreeAndClear · 2019-10-31T23:13:19.440Z

Please cite the statute that allows for the prosecution of the President for dereliction of duty.

WuWei · 2019-10-31T23:29:59.124Z

Chris:

WuWei:

If Pence runs in 2021 he will win in a landslide.

No he won’t.

Of course he will Chris. All the policies without the personality. Don’t underestimate how much America hates libidiocy.

WuWei · 2019-11-01T00:11:02.184Z

The necessity of a senate is not less indicated by the propensity of all single and numerous assemblies to yield to the impulse of sudden and violent passions, and to be seduced by factious leaders into intemperate and pernicious resolutions.

Madison - Federalist 62

Weedhopper · 2019-11-01T20:02:01.514Z

Why not it would be to a good cause.

JW has done a great job exposing those sickos like Hillary the dolt.