If Musk is serious about balancing the budget, there is a constitutional way

If Musk is really serious about balancing the annual budget, all he need do is advocate our Founder’s solution . . . a solution which is contained in the Fair Share Balanced Budget Amendment:

Fair Share Balanced Budget Amendment

“SECTION 1. The Sixteenth Amendment is hereby repealed and Congress is henceforth forbidden to lay any tax or burden calculated from profits, gains, sales, interest, salaries, wages, tips, inheritances or any other lawfully realized money.

NOTE: these words would return us to our Constitution’s original tax plan as our Founders’ intended it to operate! They would also end the experiment with allowing Congress to lay and collect taxes calculated from lawfully earned “incomes” which now oppresses America‘s economic engine and robs the bread which working people have earned when selling the property each has in their own labor, not to mention the amendment would end federal taxation being used as a political weapon to harass and attack political opponents!

“SECTION 2. Congress ought not raise money by borrowing, but when the money arising from imposts duties and excise taxes are insufficient to meet the public exigencies, and Congress has raised money by borrowing during the course of a fiscal year, Congress shall then lay a direct tax at the beginning of the next fiscal year for an amount sufficient to extinguish the preceding fiscal year’s deficit, and apply the revenue so raised to extinguishing said deficit.”

NOTE: Congress is to raise its primary revenue from imposts and duties, [taxes at our water’s edge], and may also lay miscellaneous internal excise taxes on specifically chosen articles of consumption [preferably articles of luxury]. But if Congress borrows and spends more than is brought in from imposts, duties and miscellaneous excise taxes during the course of a fiscal year, then, and only then, is the direct apportioned tax to be laid in order to balance the budget on an annual basis.

“SECTION 3. When Congress is required to lay a direct tax in accordance with Section 1 of this Article, the Secretary of the United States Treasury shall, in a timely manner, calculate each State’s apportioned share of the total sum being raised by the agreed upon apportionment formula found in our Constitution, and then provide the various State Congressional Delegations with a Bill notifying their State’s Executive and Legislature of its share of the total tax being collected as done on July 14th, 1798 LINK scroll to page 62, and a final date by which said tax shall be paid into the United States Treasury.”

NOTE: our founder’s fair share formula to extinguish an annual deficit would be:

States’ population

---------------------------- X SUM TO BE RAISED = STATE’S FAIR SHARE OF DIRECT TAX

Total U.S. Population

The above formula, as intended by our founding fathers, is to ensure that each state’s share towards extinguishing an annual deficit is proportionately equal to its representation in Congress, i.e., representation with a proportional financial obligation! And if the tax is laid directly upon the people by Congress, then every taxpayer across the United States would pay the exact same amount!

Note also that each State’s number or Representatives, under our Constitution is likewise determined by the rule of apportionment:

State`s Pop.

------------------- X House size (435) = State`s No. of Representatives
U.S. Pop.

“SECTION 4. Each State shall be free to assume and pay its quota of the direct tax into the United States Treasury by a final date set by Congress, but if any State shall refuse or neglect to pay its quota, then Congress shall send forth its officers to assess and levy such State’s proportion against the real property within the State with interest thereon at the rate of ((?)) per cent per annum, and against the individual owners of the taxable property. Provision shall be made for a 15% discount for those States paying their share by ((?))of the fiscal year in which the tax is laid, and a 10% discount for States paying by the final date set by Congress, such discount being to defray the States’ cost of collection.”

NOTE: This section respects the Tenth Amendment and allows each state to raise its share in its own chosen way in a time period set by Congress, but also allows the federal government to enter a state and collect the tax if a state is delinquent in meeting its obligation.

"SECTION 5. This Amendment to the Constitution, when ratified by the required number of States, shall take effect no later than (?) years after the required number of States have ratified it.

1 Like

There’s already a bill in Congress that was introduced in July by Congressman Russ Fulcher, a Republican from Idaho. The Keep Every Extra Penny (KEEP) Act has been referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means and also doesn’t have a lot of details beyond saying: ″Gross income shall not include overtime compensation required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards 9 Act of 1938.″⁣ There hasn’t been any further action on this bill since July.

See the ‘‘Keep Every Extra Penny Act of 2024’’

JWK

“The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable. The patrimony of the poor man lies in the strength and dexterity of his own hands; and to hinder him from employing this strength and dexterity in what manner he thinks proper, without injury to his neighbor, is a plain violation of this most sacred property.” ___ Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746 (1884)

Instead of acting like adolescent children as these two are now doing, and actually seems fishy and makes no sense, these two ought to be working to achieve an annually balanced federal budget if they are sincere as they have stated in the past.

I see neither Trump nor Musk have come up with a remedy to deal with Congress’s refusal to balance the annual budget, and stop Congress from enslaving our children and grandchildren with their profligate and thieving deficit spending.

JWK

We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in-between and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.

The problem is that both sides are addicted to spending and don’t want this. We’re simply discussing different levels of suck.

Calling for the hanging of congress people. Nice.

The ones I refer to are among the worst kind of snakes who slither on Capitol Hill, using their vote to plunder and steal from the people’s treasury.

They have increased our national debt to over $136 Trillion, including unfunded debt liabilities.

JWK

We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in-between and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.

It really would be nice to see Musk and Trump spend time on perfecting a no-no-sense balanced budget amendment, and then working to get it passed, rather than acting like adolescent children in a schoolyard fight.

no with levers of power supports a Balance Budget amendment anymore its as moldy as week-old used Tea Party leaves. It’d be a miracle to reduce spending to be tied to inflation at this point.

I have no idea what you are attempting to indicate as fact.

Fanciful dreams are fanciful dreams no matter how right you think they are.

So, you just dropped by to be a nuisance and ridicule… :roll_eyes:

my feet are just firmly rooted in the ground but be a butterfly if you wish.

You might want to consider deleting this lest someone reports this to USCP.

Well, they certainly are using their vote in Congress to plunder our treasury, and they certainly need to be punished for their countless money laundering operations by which they redistribute the contents of our federal treasury into the pockets of their donors and the pockets of Washington’s inner circle crowd.

You’re welcome.

image

Trying to break sex offenders, pedophiles, drug traffickers, gang members and human traffickers out of jail…Nice. I’m guessing what you consider to be nice or not depends on what team you’re on. Am I right?

1 Like

Getting back to the subject of the thread . . .

Congress has brought us to a ruinous financial situation in which our national debt, including unfunded debt liabilities are at a staggering $ 136 Trillion, and Speaker Johnson’s ‘‘One Big Beautiful Bill Act’’ adds to that national debt.

The Fair Share Balanced Budget Amendment, if adopted, would actually make every State’s Congressional Delegation immediately accountable to their own State Legislature if they decided to borrow to meet expenses during the course of a fiscal year.

Seems that neither Musk, Trump or Speaker Johnson embraces the accountability which the Fair Share Balanced Budget Amendment would bring. Why?

JWK

We are here today and gone tomorrow, but what is most important is what we do in-between and is what our children will inherit and remember us by.

Speaker Johnson just lied on national tv.

He claimed his bill is “geared” to advance the best interests of the American people, when the truth is, it is “geared” to dazzle the American people with a number of proposals, not one of which would stop Congress from adding to the national debt year, after year, after year.

Unfortunately, Trump seems to have been rope-a-doped by Johnson’s Bill which provides no remedy to Congress adding to the national debt, which is the worm at the root of the tree, and has brought us to a devastating financial situation in that the United States debt, including unfunded debt liabilities, now exceed $ 136 Trillion.

Is Trump really comfortable with Speaker Johnson cleverly avoiding to actually address the real problem that has brought us to our existing financial situation?