If it is true, why delay?

[Rurudyne]

The Left aren’t actually liberal but very illiberal.

They are more and more the people that anticommunists and antifascist of old were actually fighting against.

There is nothing of the old extreme Left that’s extreme to them anymore.

[C_Actor]

@Rurudyne

The Left aren’t actually liberal but very illiberal.

They are more and more the people that anticommunists and antifascist of old were actually fighting against.

There is nothing of the old extreme Left that’s extreme to them anymore.

^ The bat ■■■■ rant she screams every morning at her cats.

[zantax]

@Eagle-Keeper

How exactly could he win a defamation lawsuit as long as she sticks to her story?

I would imagine she isn’t who he would go after. More likely to go after the people calling him a rapist based on her story.

[wiley8425]

Who accused Garland of sexual assault? I don’t seem to remember that.

[zantax]

@Keyser_Soze

@Cynic

Eat your peas, lib.

Double-up, buttercup @conan! Going to be a lot of hard years ahead as Trumpism is dismantled, and you’re gonna need the stamina to watch it from the sidelines.

Eat moar peas, lib!

What I wouldn’t give to see your face when Kavanaugh is confirmed.

[Keyser_Soze]

I’m sure it will transform my life, just as Justice Roberts did. Or that other dip ■■■■■ Scalia.

That is…not too much.

[zantax]

@Keyser_Soze

I’m sure it will transform my life, just as Justice Roberts did. Or that other dip ■■■■■ Scalia.

That is…not too much.

You seem pretty angry, just saying.

[Keyser_Soze]

Just enjoying the show!

[biggestal99]

@bootz

But they are just asking for a delay, which implies, it is not true.

It implies nothing but the political need for both to testify.

Allan

[C_Actor]

@wiley8425

Who accused Garland of sexual assault? I don’t seem to remember that.

It’s the lib’s fault that our justices don’t sexually assault people?

[biggestal99]

@zantax

What I wouldn’t give to see your face when Kavanaugh is confirmed.

or yours if he isn’t

Allan

[wiley8425]

If you say so.

[Oryx]

@zantax

No, that isn’t what he said, he reportedly said.

Isn’t that exactly what I said? She remembers enough to describe the party, and Kavanaugh remembers enough to know he wasn’t there.

@zantax

and told the senator he was not at a party similar to what his accuser described.

[Mountain_Soldier]

@Rurudyne

It’s the Swedish Chef treatment, Bork, Bork, Bork!

It’s asking him to prove a negative. Tell me how easy that is.

[Eagle-Keeper]

@zantax

How exactly could he win a defamation lawsuit as long as she sticks to her story?

I would imagine she isn’t who he would go after. More likely to go after the people calling him a rapist based on her story.

Ultimately she the one claiming he wanted to rape her. Nonetheless there is no way he can demonstrate his innocence.

[Eagle-Keeper]

@wiley8425

Who accused Garland of sexual assault? I don’t seem to remember that.

Isn’t there more on the line with this seat?

[Eagle-Keeper]

@Mountain_Soldier

It’s asking him to prove a negative. Tell me how easy that is.

You are exactly right. There is no way he could prove that he is innocent. I would be shocked if something substantial came out of this hearing.

[zantax]

@biggestal99

@zantax

What I wouldn’t give to see your face when Kavanaugh is confirmed.

or yours if he isn’t

Allan

No problem, just make sure the next nominee is ever more conservative. You don’t think the democrats are taking the Senate do you? If so, you are going to be disappointed.

[zantax]

@Eagle-Keeper

@Mountain_Soldier

It’s asking him to prove a negative. Tell me how easy that is.

You are exactly right. There is no way he could prove that he is innocent. I would be shocked if something substantial came out of this hearing.

I am surprised more unprovable accusations haven’t been made yet, but its still early.

[GWH]

“No doubt he may have?” Nice parsing.