IOW. There are conditions in unconditional love.
That is like the Christian 1+1+1=1
Both statements are the same type of Christian nonsense.
Regards
DL
IOW. There are conditions in unconditional love.
That is like the Christian 1+1+1=1
Both statements are the same type of Christian nonsense.
Regards
DL
You would know.
Care to discus the morals of a genocidal son murdering Yahweh/Jesus?
Regards
DL
Correction. I noted succinctly the post to which I was responding was wrong. I also elected not to pursue any twisted paths. The straight and narrow way works better.
You corrected nothing and showed what a lousy apologist you are.
Keep it up as you do my work for me.
Regards
DL
Why do you think that I, a āliteralistā, would be annoyed by what others believe- or donāt?
Why do you think that I, a āliteralistā, would be annoyed by what others believe- or donāt?
Are you a literalist? I didnāt realize, or perhaps just didnāt remember.
Do you believe that Saul and David, etc existed and that there are no mistakes in the Bible?
Optrader:Why do you think that I, a āliteralistā, would be annoyed by what others believe- or donāt?
Are you a literalist? I didnāt realize, or perhaps just didnāt remember.
Do you believe that Saul and David, etc existed and that there are no mistakes in the Bible?
Iāve made no secret of my being a fundamentalist in my years here in the forumā¦ Iām pretty sure itās known.
If one goes the route of parts of the Bible being allegorical, the question of objectively determining which parts qualify as allegory becomes a bit of a problem.
Sure would be nice if God just cleared it up for us.
Now this is truly an excellent point. God is not the author of confusion and he has cleared it all up. Thatās why I accept the truth of his word over the truths of man. Man is fallen and therefore fallible. Well intentioned men have lead countless people to hell. That is not Goods faultā¦
Borgia_dude:If one goes the route of parts of the Bible being allegorical, the question of objectively determining which parts qualify as allegory becomes a bit of a problem.
Sure would be nice if God just cleared it up for us.
Now this is truly an excellent point. God is not the author of confusion and he has cleared it all up. Thatās why I accept the truth of his word over the truths of man. Man is fallen and therefore fallible. Well intentioned men have lead countless people to hell. That is not Goods faultā¦
Simply declaring that Fod has cleared it all up does not mean he has. He lack of harmonization of the gospels is an example of him not clearing it up.
He lack of harmonization of the gospels is an example of him not clearing it up.
What, specifically?
Optrader: Borgia_dude:If one goes the route of parts of the Bible being allegorical, the question of objectively determining which parts qualify as allegory becomes a bit of a problem.
Sure would be nice if God just cleared it up for us.
Now this is truly an excellent point. God is not the author of confusion and he has cleared it all up. Thatās why I accept the truth of his word over the truths of man. Man is fallen and therefore fallible. Well intentioned men have lead countless people to hell. That is not Goods faultā¦
Simply declaring that Fod has cleared it all up does not mean he has. He lack of harmonization of the gospels is an example of him not clearing it up.
What I mean is, he left us his word, commands us to study that word under the guidance of the Holy Spirit and will lead us into all truth if we follow his command. Keep in mind the Bible is for believers, to the lost, it is foolishness. Salvation first- THEN study. Makes all the difference in the worldā¦
Simply declaring that Fod has cleared it all up does not mean he has. He lack of harmonization of the gospels is an example of him not clearing it up.
I mean its 2000 years after christā¦yet christians still cant agree
Borgia_dude:Simply declaring that Fod has cleared it all up does not mean he has. He lack of harmonization of the gospels is an example of him not clearing it up.
I mean its 2000 years after christā¦yet christians still cant agree
The problem is that man doesnāt want to accept that there is a price on sin. If āChristiansā would accept that, most every other difference would soon vanish. Thatās the lie Satan has been pushing since Eden- no priceā¦
Thatās the lie Satan has been pushing since Eden- no priceā¦
I guess its never Gods fault
Optrader:Thatās the lie Satan has been pushing since Eden- no priceā¦
I guess its never Gods fault
Nope, never is. Why would your actions or beliefs be his fault? Arenāt you an atheist anyway?
Nope, never is. Why would your actions or beliefs be his fault? Arenāt you an atheist anyway?
Iām having a discussion. If you are a republican does that mean you cant discuss liberal beliefs? Since God created everything and created the rules/frameworks for everything, he is at least partly responsible.
Optrader:Nope, never is. Why would your actions or beliefs be his fault? Arenāt you an atheist anyway?
Iām having a discussion. If you are a republican does that mean you cant discuss liberal beliefs? Since God created everything and created the rules/frameworks for everything, he is at least partly responsible.
Heās guilty of not being a tyrant and forcing everyone to accept him as he is.
Optrader:Nope, never is. Why would your actions or beliefs be his fault? Arenāt you an atheist anyway?
Iām having a discussion. If you are a republican does that mean you cant discuss liberal beliefs? Since God created everything and created the rules/frameworks for everything, he is at least partly responsible.
Would you prefer to have not been created?
Heās guilty of not being a tyrant and forcing everyone to accept him as he is.
Oh so we dont have accept him in heaven?
Would you prefer to have not been created?
Iād prefer God create heaven and be done. Instead of playing hunger games