102

They don’t have a voice as they are not constitutionally eligible to have one.

Allan

103

I am a conservative and I have no problem with charging a mother and a provider.

104

Your ploy is obvious. But we don’t have to play.

105

Victims are created by the actions of others, not their own.

106

Compared to the DNC campaign budget and their PACs driving Pro-Choice arguments would be a better comparison.

1 Like
107

The laws of the jurisdiction where the deed occurred determine the legal standpoint. If it isn’t against the law to hire a contractor and end your husband’s life in the jurisdiction, then it isn’t.

As to moral standpoint ending an adult’s life is no more, or less, immoral than taking the life of an unborn child’s.

2 Likes
108

And here’s the first state proudly proclaiming that they will be an abortion mecca. California. Not unexpected, nor surprising.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gavin-newsom-california-will-be-abortion-sanctuary-if-roe-v-wade-overturned/ar-AARCD24?li=BBnbcA1

109

The “my body, my choice” logic is like inviting a friend over for a dinner party, they bring their spouse, but then you dismember the spouse or starve them by putting them inside your basement and hiding the body.

110

I don’t turn my back on them. I always, ALWAYS get resources to them, offer to help with anything I can from chores to lending them some money- I say lend but I really don’t expect it back. In the very least, I drop everything that I’m doing and listen to them and empathize.

I would be willing to bet I’m not the only pro-lifeer who does this.

1 Like
111

Many teen girls and DV victims are duped into abortions, either through threats/manipulation or just ignorance of what options are out there.

That hurts to know that every day these vulnerable women are being manipulated by their spouse, parents, or the abortion industry. It’s not fair to them.

1 Like
112

Well, if some states are going to effectively outlaw abortion, is it surprising that those with the means to do so will simply travel to other states?

113

No, it’s still a dumb, incoherent comparison.

114

Not in the least. Middle class and up will still have access to abortions, the poor who can’t afford to travel will be suppressed.

Since the poor vote more DEM, one wonders if that will bite the GOP in the long run.

WW

1 Like
115

I expect that in places like California, retroactive abortion will become the new frontier.

Life is terminal and inherently involves suffering, so every child could be classified as “terminally ill” and eligible for parent-approved “assisted suicide”. Similar laws already exist in parts of Europe.

1 Like
116

Maybe eventually taking the life of an unborn child will be come as reprehensible to everyone as taking the life of a 3 month old child.

2 Likes
117

It clearly isn’t, though—and even pro-life people don’t act like it is.

Here’s what I mean: if there was a medical specialty/field in which mothers routinely took their three-month olds (or however old) to an office where the result was the child being vaporized and sent up a chimney, wouldn’t people be doing more to stop it than they are with abortion? As with slavery, genocide, and other horrors, it seems like the entire legal system which upheld such a thing would be illegitimate and therefore, invite morally justified law-breaking and morally justified violence to protect thousands and thousands of lives. But that rarely ever happens. Why?

118

Hit too close to home huh.

1 Like
119

I guess my only explanation for this is that people have been told over and over that the body inside a woman’s body is not a separate life and some people believe it.

1 Like
120

Absolutely no surprise at all.

Likewise no surprise that California would boast about being an abortion mecca.