ICC seeks arrest warrants for Israeli and Hamas leaders

The International Criminal Court is seeking arrest warrants for Hamas leader in Gaza Yahya Sinwar and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity over the October 7 attacks on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza, the court’s prosecutor Karim Khan told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour in an exclusive interview on Monday.

Khan said the ICC’s prosecution team is also seeking warrants for Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, as well as two other top Hamas leaders — Mohammed Diab Ibrahim al-Masri, the leader of the Al Qassem Brigades who is better known as Mohammed Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’ political leader.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/20/middleeast/icc-israel-hamas-arrest-warrant-war-crimes-intl/index.html

Congressional leaders have previously threatened retribution against the ICC and the justices if the ICC issues warrants against Israeli leaders.

https://www.axios.com/2024/05/20/icc-netanyahu-arrest-warrant-congress

It is unlikely that Israeli or Hamas leaders will be arrested as a result of an ICC warrant since neither Israel nor Hamas are parties to the treaty that established the court. The immediate issue would be that officials sought in any warrants could be arrested if they go to countries that enforce the warrant. At this point, most of Europe, Latin America, and Africa have ratified the treaty that established the ICC.

The US has applauded ICC actions in the past when they have supported policies from Washington, but the US and Israel have not ratified the treaty that created the court. Congress has even pre-authorized the use of force the free any Americans under arrest at the ICC under the so-called Invade-the-Hague statute.

Is the ICC effectively finished as a working body the US imposes sanctions or directs military action to force the ICC to withdraw arrest warrants against Israelis?

Is that a good thing?

Or should the US support the ICC even when it goes against State Department policy?

Who elected this “ICC” and which nations do they claim to have authority over? :rofl:

4 Likes

All the green in the map in the OP corresponds to nations that are obliged by treaty to enforce an ICC warrant. Most have elected governments.

Should Blinken walk back his earlier support for the court?

“I think anyone who’s a party to the court and has obligations should fulfill their obligations,” Blinken said . . .

The ICC is unique in one way. It is the only organization I know of that has arrest warrants out for two people who control armies and likely nuclear weapons.
I would not volunteer to serve those warrants.

2 Likes

So basically all the beta nations playing pretend without the consent of the governed. Got it. :rofl:

124 nations have signed up to recognize the ICC. The US, Israel and Palestine have not; however Palestine has recognized the jurdistiction of the ICC so it will be interesting to see their reaction.

And which country is this stupidity oozing out of? Someone is clearly begging for attention out there. :rofl:

Oh I totally get the hypocrisy of SA bringing this action. Though to be fair not really read a lot on this as its really just all noise and does nothing to help the situation.

1 Like

South Africa?

image

1 Like

Is that Costa Rica holding out in central America?

What is the difference between the red and orange on the map?

Oh cool.

ICC is shining a spotlight on its fecklessness and paper-tiger irrelevancy. :+1: :+1:

2 Likes

thats false, Palestine is a signatory.

why would he need to walk back anything?

K…now let them start their war with Israel and then we’ll take a relook 6 days later.

[quote=“Bill.in.PA, post:1, topic:247090”]
The International Criminal Court is seeking arrest warrants for . . .

the court’s prosecutor Karim Khan told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour in an exclusive interview on Monday.[/quote]

Interesting a court tht has its own prosecutor.
So much for separation of powers.

Maybe they should write their own laws to.
I mean if we roll the executive and judicial powers into one why not the legislative too.

One person or one body with the power to write the laws, execute the laws and adjudicate them. . . . What could possibly go wrong? Who could possibly object to that?

[quote=“Gaius, post:15, topic:247090, full:true”]

They have no real authority.

Netanyahu should tell them to pound sand.

…and I love it.


The ICC just declared themselves to be a joke. What kind of an evil is present in a culture, to do what Hamas did? It must be eradicated off of the face of this planet along with anyone, everyone and anything that would support this absolute evil.

The ICC has no authority to arrest anybody anyway to speak of.

Netanyahu should tell them to Pound Sand!

3 Likes

The Palestinian Authority has agreed to support the treaty. Hamas has not.