As I understand it, that was one of the reasons his supporters voted for him. He’s a man’s man, not just another politician. Because you know only real men cheat on their wives while said wives are carrying their unborn children. Family values, ya’ll.
Paying off a bimbo to shut her up isn’t a crime or half of DC would probably be behind bars. 
And infidelity is only an issue when it’s the other party committing it. We get it.
“DC” IS both parties. 
If you have a link showing my hypocrisy on the subject please post it.
Yeah, I remember you saying the act between Clinton and a certain intern wasn’t a crime either. Oh wait.
You remember a lot of things that never happened apparently.
Seek help.
1 Like
I know it never happened genius. That’s the point. So since it obviously wasn’t a crime, since you know, there’s no hypocrisy here and all, what exactly did Clinton need to testify under oath to end up purjuring himself for? Inquiring minds want to know.
So you’re saying civil suits don’t require a crime? Interesting. I wonder how they come to the conclusion that damages should be awarded without any sort of offense committed? Or is this only in the CEC universe where this virus is either a Democrat hoax or a global conspiracy to keep Trump from being re-elected? 
No, civil suits do not require a crime.
We have both civil and criminal statutes, only one of those requires a crime to be committed.
Contempt of court citation[edit]
In April 1999, about two months after being acquitted by the Senate, Clinton was cited by federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright for civil contempt of court for his “willful failure” to obey her orders to testify truthfully in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit. For this, Clinton was assessed a $90,000 fine and the matter was referred to the Arkansas Supreme Court to see if disciplinary action would be appropriate.[48]
Regarding Clinton’s January 17, 1998, deposition where he was placed under oath, Webber Wright wrote:
Simply put, the president’s deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false, and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false.[48]
.
It was a Federal Civil Suit for Sexual Harassment, he faced no criminal penalties for anything except lying on the stand/in his deposition.
So wouldn’t sexual harrassment be a crime? And again, if a certain act wasn’t a crime, what was he being required to testify about? Since you know, it’s normal to testify about things that aren’t crimes and all. Apparently.
He was being sued for damages in a civil case, there was no crime, just a civil claim for damages.
This isn’t getting any better and the facts aren’t changing.
Well we all know the nyt article was written well before the larry king tape surfaced, so for his campaign to fall back on that is patently false.
Shocking!
1 Like
joe bidenis the first inarticulate, dirty and dim politician to go 50 years without any press scrutiny.
It’s starting to crack a little. The Washington Post is demanding that the records be unsealed. Somebody needs to ask Joe if he agrees?
WuWei
199
Agrees? He has to DEMAND it or he’s guilty!
2 Likes
He’s not going to demand the rope used to hang him. Somebody has to ask him to his face if the record should be unsealed. If that doesn’t happen, he will maintain radio silence.
WuWei
201
I’m sure CNN and NYT are preparing to ask that question as we speak.
Anderson Cooper is chomping at the bit!
2 Likes
