SixFoot
21
I was hoping someone would bring up water vapor.
You know what would cause a lot of water vapor all of a sudden? An 80 gigaton blast in the arctic, curtesy of a one-mile-wide comet of average Earth crustal density.
How about more than one (Greenland)? 
Check this out, we still travel through the debris field of that celestial impact 12,000+ years later. Itâs called the Taurids Meteor Stream, and the news always likes to wow us with meteor showers when we pass through it each year.
Wait, Taurids Meteor Stream? You mean the same stream where the Tunguska Meteor came from, where even over a century later, trees still canât grow? 
2 Likes
e7alr
22
It would have to flash melt a substantial portion of the ice shelf, as the impact would trigger a nuclear winter effect. Such an event, obliterating 25-30% of the shelf would immediately change global sea level and atmospheric humidity concentration. The impact following nuclear winter effect would lower carrying capacity, but the resulting precipitation would be world wide and the majority of that precipitation would remain in liquid state. As the debris from such an impact settled out of the atmosphere several factors would then come into play increasing global atmospheric humidity and thus global atmospheric temperature.
SixFoot
23
Ejecta sites from the blasts are found in the United States as well. From the Carolinas to the Midwest, in fact.
http://www.cintos.org/SaginawManifold/Saginaw_Bay/
Just as there is a black mat layer indicating the celestial impact that lead to the extinction of the dinosaurs (the K-T Boundary Layer), there is also a black mat layer that coincides with a series of impacts ~13,000 years ago (The Black Mat Layer).
Also, immediately following those impacts are the Younger Dryas cooling event (the winter you mentioned), where the Earth cooled dramatically for a short period before exponential warmth brought us out of the Glacial Period.
Something to note is that the impacts happened over a place covered in miles-thick sheets of ice. âSmallerâ impacts wouldnât leave as much evidence behind in this case, especially if underneath said ice was ocean.
Everything points to a celestial impact. Nothing supports humans causing the extinction of 70+% of all mega-fauna in the north western hemisphere at that exact time.
JayJay
24
Please provide a link to anyone saying the UK would never see any snow ever again, starting now.
Thanks in advance.
JayJay
25
And you think todayâs climate scientists, the majority of which support the idea of human-catalyzed climate change, donât know this?
e7alr
26
Ah, the appeal to authority deflection.
1 Like
zantax
27
How many climate scientists do we need it the climate is fine?
1 Like
SixFoot
28
We are in the longest period of stable climate on record.
We are very overdue for our next cycle of glacial advance. Keep burning that carbon, folks. We donât want our food freezing again!
3 Likes
e7alr
29
The first claim of this type came out in 2000 from a scientist at (you canât make this up) the infamous Climate Research Unit at University of East Anglia in the UK. Then when it didnât happen the prediction was made again in 2010 and now again in 2021.
One would think that the climate crisis crowd would at least remember their sides past claims of impending doom.
3 Likes
they like to pretend such things werent said, and hope that time and the lefter-net will bury the evidence
1 Like
Rodeo
31
WaitâŚlibs want to cripple the economy and change everything we do because ⌠climate change is an existential threat and we were 10 years away 12 years ago and now AOC said weâve only got 12 years three years ago except she changed that andâŚbacked it off a few years? I m confusedâŚ
(We are all going to regret all the time and Monet wasted and pain inflicted while making policy to solve this âcrisisâ that is nothing more than a tool for bureaucrats to increase their power).
2 Likes
e7alr
32
I think they have just lost track of how many, now unfulfilled predictions of climate doom have occurred.
3 Likes
SixFoot
33
I feel like Iâm going to come out way closer to the top than most folks either way. I mean, trying to scare a farmer with having to sweat during the day. Honestly⌠lol
2 Likes
e7alr
34
What gets me is that warmer temperatures, and the associated higher atmospheric humidity, would turn many of the worldâs deserts into large grasslands, suitable for agricultural production and human habitation.
It is the lack of humidity, and associated rainfall, not temperature that makes a desert.
1 Like
SixFoot
35
The Sahara as we know it has only existed for about 5,000 years at this point. Before that, it was lush and green, rivers and lakes everywhere.
In another 5,000 years, it will return to green. Itâs all cyclic, and none of it is our âfaultâ.
1 Like
50 years of failed climate predictions and the left will still sacrifice your prosperity and health for their silly beliefs.
Just like two million Americans were going to die from covid in the first year. Didnât happen!
2 Likes
Tony Heller documents NOAA cooling past data and warming the present. All big govt is corrupt! See FBI lies,IRS abuse and the CIA always wrongâŚ
JayJay
38
I didnât appeal to authority. I didnât ask you to believe anything.
I asked if you thought they didnât know that climate patterns change over time.
A simple âyes they doâ or âno they donâtâ would suffice here.
JayJay
39
The same number we âneedâ if itâs not fine.
You didnât answer the question, either
zantax
40
Until you can be honest and admit there would be far fewer climate science jobs I am not going to either. Not to mention the field itself self selects for those who think there is a problem.