I thought coal was back

I wish you and your definition of socialism were around during the Obama administration.

No you defined means of production as being all four. That’s your definition. Socialism can be where there is control of all four but it does not have to. It is a purity test.

I defined? Ok. Look up the definition of means of production and get back to me. Show me where it refers to only one of the four. I’ll wait.

Uh, no. It’s basically public ownership of the oil resources and the residents of Alaska get a check for the dividends funded from proceeds when they sell it to the oil companies.

Yes the public owns the oil and the land it sits on. The public doesn’t own the oil company, the labor hired by the oil company, or the equipment the oil company uses to extract said oil. Like I said.

Great, so it’s socialized ownership of the resources. Glad we could agree. Now let’s do this at the federal level :+1:

Means of production can include all four. Socialism doesn’t require it. It does according to purists. It doesn’t according to its broad definition. Socialism is the involvement of government in controlling resources for the purposes of redistribution not necessarily the control of all resources.

Talk to your reps.

And you promise you won’t scream socialism and explain to those who do?

That’s not th definition I read. Who’s making ■■■■ up now?

You are not reading what i wrote. I am agreeing with you means of production includes all four. Socialism does not require the control of all four.

Why would I? I’m not the one complaining about Alaska either. I wish my state reps made a similar deal. They just sold the land out from under us.

2 Likes

Complaining… come on. A red state supporting state controlled redistribution. Lol

I read what you wrote.

As a whole. I don’t see “in part” anywhere.

You call it state controlled redistribution, I call it fair compensation. Go figure.

Nope. Royalties the state gets are put into what’s known as the community impact account. Cities and counties that are impacted by resource removal can apply for loans/grants from the community impact board for things that help the communities. Water systems, fire trucks, sidewalks, roads, community centers.

The City I live in just submitted a 4 million dollar 50/50 (50% grand 50% low interest loan) application to work on roads.

McDee’s BK, Wendy’s arby’s even a walmart :smiley:

Is there another word for “the government taking a share of the money from a private enterprise and redistributing it to the public”?

You seem confused. Maybe you should look up the actual law before commenting on it. It’s not redistribution. The money goes into a fund before it gets to the people. If taxes aren’t redistribution, this isn’t either.

When taxes are paid directly to people, they are redistribution.