Bless your heart.

You think that if Congress doesn’t confirm Trumps current Pick for Supreme court that President Pence will pick very Moderate Judges?
No I suspect that we will get a More Conservative harder right judge unless you expect the Democrats to delay the pick for 2 more years?

Now you are just insulting my intelligence. Anyone with a computer can google Levin and see that you either didn’t take the time to explore his credentials or that you are just flat out lying.

I meant from a republicans perspective obviously.

His desire to keep people like you listening to him is his full time job and expertise and colors what he says to you far more than his legal expertise does. We’ll all know where this goes soon enough.

Something we can agree on.

Kavanaugh will be confirmed by this Senate before the mid-terms.

If Cohen would claim ā€œyes, I have knowledge ofā€¦ā€, how can you trust him, if he was offered a deal, go out of jail card for saying whatever Mueller and his witch hunt team want him to say?

He’s not an entertainer?

He’s not paid for his legal advice. He’s paid to have adds for laundry detergent between his rants.

He worked as a political staffer for Reagan and Meese, and spent a couple of years in the private sector as a lawyer. He’s the ceremonial President of a Conservative legal think tank.

None of that makes Levin a ā€œlegal expertā€. He has not published any scholarly legal writings. He does not have an advanced law degree, such as an LLM or LLD. He has no experience in campaign finance law, nor did he participate in any notable cases. He is not cited in any legal scholarship that I’m aware of.

1 Like

Man, you do not have the beyond-fourth dimensional thinking that Trump is capable of.

Here’s how Trump does it. He, as President Trump, pardons David Dennison, who is not President Trump. A totally different guy.

Buuuut, David Dennison IS Trump, but just not the President part of Trump.

No conflict of interest. Different guy pardoning different guy, who’s actually kinda the same guy.

Perfect outcome.

1 Like

Cohen, as previously demonstrated, has recordings of Trump. I agree I wouldn’t build a case around taking Cohen at his word.

But I’m far less interested in building a case as I am interested in the ramifications of these allegations for the next two elections.

The recordings we got to hear in the media had been manipulated. Giuliani pointed out the points where you can hear that. Since then, the liberal fake news didnt played the tapes anymore and they also abruptly avoided to tell anything about tapes. All suspicions justified that everything related to Cohen is fake and made up in order to take down Trump

So, fishing expedition in order to manipulate the outcome of the next elections?? :face_with_raised_eyebrow:

I stopped reading after this.

1 Like

Like every liberal you prefere your made up ā€œrealityā€ over the truth
Thats why people like you are the problem of our present times

I dd not know senile Giuliani was an audio expert as well.

Don’t project your ignorance onto me.

I’m confident in my understanding of campaign finance law. I’ve worked on numerous political campaigns, and I’ve taken a class on Campaign Finance law at a top-25 Law School.

One does not need to be an ā€œexpertā€ to have an informed opinion.

You dont even have to be an expert to hear that
Fact is, the liberal fake news media abruptly stopped to mention any tapes after that, theor reaction being the evidence that Giuliani was right, exposing them again as the liars and hypocrites they are

Giuliani is a known liar. How can you trust him?

image